Previous
Situational Irony
Chapter 1
Explanation and Analysis:
Befitting its status as a work of satire, Candide’s overall style is witty and ironic, demonstrating the breadth of Voltaire’s learning but also his sharp sense of humor. Throughout the novella, he lampoons various different nations and cultural institutions, but his primary targets are philosophical. He also critiques various ideas, such as those associated with the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, with wit and humor rather than rigorous argumentation. His description of Professor Pangloss highlights Voltaire’s characteristic wit and irony:
Pangloss was professor of metaphysico-theologico-cosmolo-nigology. He proved admirably that there is no effect without a cause, and that, in this best of all possible worlds, the Baron’s castle was the most magnificent of castles, and his lady the best of all possible Baronesses.“It is demonstrable,” said he, “that things cannot be otherwise than as they are; for all being created for an end, all is necessarily for the best end. Observe, that the nose has been formed to bear spectacles—thus we have spectacles. Legs are visibly designed for stockings—and we have stockings.
Mocking Leibniz’s reputation as a “polymath” or expert in various fields, Pangloss is a professor of “metaphysico-theologico-cosmolo-nigology,” a fictional discipline that seems to combine various aspects of philosophy, theology, and science. His argument that “there is no effect without a cause” is merely obvious and hardly warrants proof, and his optimistic faith that Earth is the “best of all possible worlds,” an important idea in Lebniz’s philosophy, is lampooned throughout the novella, which features constant misfortune and tragedy. Further, Pangloss’s ideas are presented as being at odds with practical reality, and he makes such obvious errors as believing that “the nose has been formed to bear spectacles” when the more obvious explanation is that spectacles have been designed to fit the shape of the human nose. Voltaire demonstrates his sharp wit here, not only mocking the personality of Leibniz but also his ideas and philosophical methods.
Related Themes:
