The tension between belief in God and non-belief animates much of the novel. That tension is especially noticeable in the storylines of, and debates between, Shatov, Pyotr, and Stepan. Shatov was once an adherent of the revolutionary socialism advocated by Pyotr. He defected, though, and embraced a distinctly Russian form of Christianity. According to Shatov, religion serves the purpose of uniting the people of a country under common ideas of good and evil. In Shatov’s telling, the people of a country are the “body of God.” Shatov argues that socialism is defined by an overreliance on reason and science and that reason and science can never adequately define good and evil. Pyotr, who embraces socialism and atheism, then murders Shatov. That murder can then be interpreted as socialism and atheism’s attempt to kill faith in God. The novel suggests that if faith is abolished and is replaced by atheism, then morality will vanish with it. If that happens, people like Pyotr will then run the world, virtually guaranteeing further immorality, death, and destruction.
The novel links its narrative chronology to a historical assessment of Russia. In Dostoevsky’s telling, socialism and atheism have succeeded in seriously wounding faith, just as Pyotr succeeds in killing Shatov. Shatov cannot come back to life, meaning that the ideas he represents—including his attachment to a distinctly Russian form of Christianity—cannot be revivified in the same form now that socialism and atheism have been introduced. Instead, Dostoevsky offers a new path forward through Stepan’s deathbed conversion experience. In that sense, after Shatov is killed, his ideas are reborn in Stepan, but they must take a different form going forward. On his deathbed, Stepan says that belief in God is paramount, but the particular ideas of what that faith looks like remain open. Fundamental to Stepan’s idea of God, though, is that God represents something “immeasurably just” and happy. That justice provides a necessary alternative to Pyotr’s lawlessness. With that in mind, the novel suggests that the introduction of atheism has made it impossible for Russia to return to the distinctly Russian theism represented and advocated by Shatov. Instead, Russia must chart a new path forward while retaining faith in God, a transformation that is represented by Stepan’s conversion experience. While that new version of faith has yet to be fully defined, Dostoyevsky argues that it is necessary to save Russia from the immorality, death, and destruction promised by the atheism that Pyotr represents.
Atheism vs. Belief in God ThemeTracker
Atheism vs. Belief in God Quotes in Demons
While abroad Shatov radically revised certain of his former socialist convictions and jumped to the opposite extreme. He was one of those idealistic Russian beings who are suddenly struck by some powerful idea and immediately, then and there, seem to be crushed by it, even sometimes permanently. They are never equipped to deal with it, and instead come to believe in it passionately, and so their entire life from then on passes in its final throes, as it were, under the stone that has fallen upon them and already crushed them half to death.
‘Man is afraid of death because he loves life, that’s how I understand it,’ I observed, ‘and nature has ordained it so.’
‘That’s vile, and that’s the basis of the whole deception!’ His eyes began to flash. ‘Life is pain, life is fear and man is unhappy. Now all is pain and fear. Now man loves life because he loves pain and fear. And that’s how he’s been made. Now life is given in exchange for pain and fear, and that’s the basis of the whole deception. Now man is still not what he should be. There will be a new man, happy and proud. Whoever doesn’t care whether he lives or doesn’t live, he will be the new man. Whoever conquers pain and fear, he himself will be God. And that other God will no longer be.’
‘Each people has its own concept of evil and good, and its own evil and good. When many different peoples begin to hold concepts of evil and good in common, then the peoples die out, and then the very difference between evil and good begins to blur and disappear. Reason has never had the power of defining evil and good or separating evil from good, even approximately. On the contrary, it has always mixed them up in a shameful and pitiful fashion, whereas science has found solutions by sheer force.’
‘And is it […] true that in Petersburg you belonged to some secret society that practised bestial carnality? Is it true that the Marquis de Sade could have taken lessons from you? Is it true that you seduced and debauched children?’ […]
‘I did say these words, but I didn’t harm any children,’ Stavrogin pronounced, but only after a very prolonged silence. He had turned pale, and his eyes blazed.
‘But you said them!’ Shatov continued imperiously, not taking his flashing eyes off him. ‘Is it true that you stated you didn’t make a distinction between the beauty of any instance of bestial carnality and a heroic deed of any kind, even the sacrifice of one’s life for humanity? Is it true that you found equal beauty and identical pleasure in both these extremes?’
‘It’s impossible to answer like this… I don’t want to answer,’ Stavrogin muttered.
‘You got married out of a passion for inflicting torment, out of a passion for feeling the pangs of conscience, out of moral carnality […] When you bit the governor’s ear, did you feel a surge of carnality? Did you feel it? You idle, footloose son of a landowner, did you feel it?’
‘You’re a psychologist,’ Stavrogin was growing increasingly pale, ‘although you are partly mistaken about the reasons for my marriage…’
‘Oh, Nikolay Vsevolodovich,’ he exclaimed, ‘what troubled me most of all was that this was completely against all civil laws, and primarily those of the fatherland! Suddenly they would print that people should go out with pitchforks, and remember that he who went out poor in the morning could return home rich in the evening. Just think of it, sir! I was shaking in my boots, but I was distributing them. Or suddenly there would be five or six lines addressed to all of Russia, for no good reason: “Lock the churches as soon as you can, destroy God, violate marriages, destroy the rights of inheritance, take up knives”, that’s all, and the Devil knows what else. That was the piece of paper, with the five lines, that I was almost caught with, but the officers of the regiment gave me a good beating and then, God bless them, let me go.’
‘That’s to say, that watchman and me, we brung all the stuff together, and later on, towards mornin’, by the river, we got to quarrellin’ as to who was gonna carry the sack. I sinned, I lightened his burden a bit.’
‘Kill some more, steal some more.’
‘Pyotr Stepanovich is handin’ me that same advice, in them same words as you, ’cause he’s a real stingy and hard-hearted man when it comes to givin’ assistance. Besides which, he ain’t got no belief at all in the heavenly creator, who fashioned us out o’ the dust of the earth. He says it’s jes’ nature made everythin’, even down to the last animal.’
‘There are seconds — they come only five or six at a time — when you suddenly feel the presence of an eternal harmony that has been fully attained. This is not something earthly. I’m not saying that it’s heavenly, but that man in his earthly form cannot endure it. He must change physically or else die. It is a clear and unambiguous feeling. It’s as if you suddenly have a sense of nature as a whole, and you suddenly say: yes, this is true. God, when he was creating the world, said at the end of each day of creation: “Yes, this is true, this is good.” This… this is not deep emotion, but is simply joy. […] If it lasts longer than five seconds, your soul can’t endure it and must disappear. In these five seconds I live an entire lifetime, and for them I will give my entire life, because it’s worth it.’
‘For me there is no higher idea than the nonexistence of God. Human history is behind me. Man has done nothing but invent God in order to live without killing himself; that’s the essence of world history to this point. I am the only one in world history who hasn’t felt like inventing God for the first time. Let people find that out once and for all.’
‘He won’t shoot himself,’ an alarmed Pyotr Stepanovich was thinking.
‘A great many ideas are coming to me now: you see, it’s just like our Russia. These demons who come out of the sick man and enter the swine — these are all the sores, all the contagions, all the uncleanness, all the demons, large and small, who have accumulated in our great and beloved sick man, our Russia, over the course of centuries, centuries! […] and I perhaps am the first, standing at the very head; and we shall throw ourselves, the madmen and the possessed, from a rock into the sea and we shall all drown, and that’s no more than we deserve, because that’s precisely what we’re fit for. But the sick man will be healed and “will sit at the feet of Jesus.”’