The novel uses the revolutionary faction, led by Pyotr, to portray the harmful and dangerous impacts of herd mentality. Herd mentality is the phenomenon when individuals conform to the ideas and opinions of a group, often sacrificing their own sense of morality or their own beliefs to do so. That mentality plays a pivotal role in the revolutionary faction’s decision to murder Shatov. The impulse for the murder comes during a revolutionary meeting in which Pyotr asks each member if they would inform on the group to authorities if they knew of a planned political assassination. Shatov defies the group, and goes against herd mentality, by refusing to answer the question. The novel then shows the cost of that defiance, as the group decides to murder Shatov because his lack of deference to the group convinces them that he is an informer.
Herd mentality continues to play a role as the plan to murder Shatov goes forward. Though some individual members of the faction are against the idea, each one signs off on the plan so as not to go against the group. The qualms of individuals’ consciences persist up to the moment when Shatov is murdered. Virginsky continues to argue against the plan up to the last minute, and Shigalyov leaves to avoid being part of the murder. Notably, though, no one warns Shatov or acts to stop the murder, showing the extent to which each member remains loyal to the group despite their own individual misgivings. The murder then goes ahead as Pyotr planned, making it clear how the power of the group, and of herd mentality, overcome the resistance of individuals, even when a person’s life hangs in the balance. The idea of herd mentality is reinforced by the novel’s epigraph, which comes from Luke 8:32-6. In that passage, demons leave a man and enter into a herd of swine. That herd then rushes into a lake and drowns. Stepan references that same passage on his deathbed and links it to the fate of Russia. With that in mind, the novel argues that herd mentality, or the willingness to forego one’s conscience to avoid upsetting a group, can have dire consequences that will drive Russia, and perhaps the world as a whole, to destruction.
Herd Mentality ThemeTracker
Herd Mentality Quotes in Demons
‘Lizaveta Nikolayevna, really and truly, you can grind me in a mortar, but he’s innocent; on the contrary, he’s been crushed and is raving, as you can see. He’s not guilty of anything, of anything, even in thought! It’s all the doing of robbers who will certainly be found in a week and punished by flogging. It’s all the fault of Fedka the Convict and the Shpigulin workers; the whole town is chattering about it, and that’s why I am too.’
‘Is that so? Is that so?’ Liza was waiting, all atremble, for the final verdict.
‘I didn’t kill them and I was against it, but I knew they would be killed, and I didn’t stop the killers. Step away from me, Liza,’ Stavrogin said, and he went into the drawing room.
Liza covered her face with her hands and went out of the house.
‘Here’s something to make you laugh: the first thing that has a tremendous effect is a uniform. There’s nothing more powerful than a uniform. I make a point of dreaming up ranks and offices: I have secretaries, secret agents, treasurers, chairmen, registrars, their colleagues — it’s a lot of fun and it has really caught on. After that, the second most powerful force is, of course, sentimentality. You know, socialism in Russia is spreading primarily out of sentimentality.’
Every one of these five operatives formed the first group in the fervent belief that it was merely a unit that linked hundreds and thousands of similar groups of five, just like theirs, scattered throughout Russia, and that everything depended on some huge but secret central organization that, in turn, was organically linked with the universal European revolution.
‘People cry: “A hundred million heads”. That’s perhaps just a metaphor, but why be afraid of them, if despotism, with its slow paper daydreams, in a hundred years or so will consume not a hundred but five hundred million heads? […] therefore I respectfully ask this worthy company not to vote, but to declare, directly and simply, what makes you happier: a tortoise-like procession in the swamp, or crossing the swamp under full sail?’
‘I’m absolutely for full sail!’ the high-school student cried enthusiastically.
‘So am I,’ replied Lyamshin.
[…]
‘I must admit that I’m more for a humane solution,’ said the major, ‘but since everyone is for yours, then I’ll go along with the rest.’
‘But one or two generations of debauchery are essential now — unprecedented, utterly vile debauchery, when people turn into nasty, cowardly, cruel, self-centred scum — that’s what we need! And with “a little fresh blood” besides, so that they can get used to it. Why are you laughing? I’m not contradicting myself. I’m only contradicting philanthropists and Shigalyovism, but not myself. I’m a scoundrel, and not a socialist.’
[…]
‘So you’re not really a socialist, but some sort of political… self-seeker.’
‘A scoundrel, a scoundrel […] the whole carnival sideshow will collapse, and then we’ll think about how to put up a structure of stone. For the first time! We shall do the building, we, we alone!’
What’s he doing there?’
‘He’s putting out the fire, Your Excellency.’
‘That’s impossible. The fire is in people’s minds, and not on the roofs of houses. Pull him down and leave everything!’
A curious fact had come to light: on the very outskirts of the quarter, on a piece of empty ground, beyond the vegetable gardens, no less than fifty paces from the other buildings, stood a small wooden house that had just been built, and this isolated house had caught fire almost before all the others, at the very beginning of the conflagration. […] As it turned out, the house had caught fire on its own and independently, and therefore suspiciously. But the main thing was that it had not actually burned down, and inside it, towards dawn, surprising things were discovered […] there were tenants in the house — a captain who was well known in the town, his sister and an aged servant of theirs; and these tenants — the captain, his sister and the servant — all three of them had had their throats cut during the night, and had evidently been robbed.
Suddenly someone shouted: ‘It’s Stavrogin’s woman!’ Then: ‘It’s not enough for them to commit murder, they have to come and look!’ Suddenly I saw someone’s hand raised above her head from behind, and then it came down; Liza fell. Mavriky Nikolayevich let out a dreadful cry and rushed to help her, hitting with all his strength a man who was trying to block his way. But at that very instant the tradesman grabbed him from behind with both hands. For some time it was impossible to make anything out in the scuffle that ensued. Liza seemed to get up, but fell again from another blow.
[…]
As an eyewitness, albeit a distant one, I had to give evidence at the inquest: I stated that everything had happened quite accidentally, the work of people who, though perhaps incited, were scarcely aware of what they were doing as they were drunk and disorderly. I hold this opinion even now.
Virginsky suddenly flared up, ‘I protest… I protest as vigorously as I can… I want… This is what I want: when he gets here, I want all of us to come out and ask him. If it’s true, then we accept his repentance, and if he gives his word of honour, then we let him go. In any case, we’ll have a trial; we’ll have a trial; we’ll act only after a trial. And not us hiding, and then falling upon him.’
‘To put the common cause at risk because of someone’s word of honour is the height of stupidity!’
‘Having given the matter a great deal of thought, I have decided that the proposed murder is not only a waste of valuable time, which could be used in a more essential and relevant way, but above and beyond that, it represents the sort of pernicious deviation from the normal path that has always done the utmost harm to the cause and has sidetracked its successes for decades, by subordinating itself to the influence of frivolous and primarily political people, instead of pure socialists.’
To the question of why so many murders, scandals and vile acts had been committed, [Lyamshin] answered with feverish haste that it was for the purpose of ‘systematically shaking the foundations, systematically undermining society and all principles; for the purpose of demoralizing everyone and throwing everything into chaos, and then, once society had begun to totter as a result — and was sick and weakened, cynical and devoid of beliefs, yet still yearning for some guiding idea and self-preservation — they would suddenly take it into their hands, raising the banner of rebellion and relying on a complete network of groups of five, which would all be active at the same time, recruiting and making practical efforts to search out all the means and all the weak spots that could be exploited’.