I, Robot

by

Isaac Asimov

I, Robot: Evidence Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Calvin recounts to the reporter some of the progress that Earth made using robots. When she was born, Earth had just gone through World War II, and then began grouping itself into regions instead of nations. The economy was stabilized—a change brought about by robots called the Machines. But before she explains more about the Machines, she says that she has to tell the story of Stephen Byerley and Francis Quinn.
Here Calvin foreshadows the final story of the book, “The Evitable Conflict.” She hints at the fact that the Machines are what enable the stability of the human economy, and the fact that the Machines take complete control over the world’s stability.
Themes
Human Superiority and Control Theme Icon
In 2032, Quinn and Byerley are locked in a political race for mayor. During the campaign, Quinn approaches Lanning and Calvin. He explains that he has been investigating Mr. Byerley, and that the man has never been seen eating, drinking, or sleeping. Quinn suggests that he is a robot, and asks them to verify that this is the case. Lanning is hesitant, but Quinn reminds him that U.S. Robots would be held responsible if a positronic robot was discovered masquerading as a man, as they are the only manufacturer of positronic robots in the Solar System.
“Evidence,” however, is yet another reinforcement of how robots can be more ethical than the humans. Quinn is trying to discredit Byerley’s qualifications on the basis that he is a robot, and yet Quinn shows himself to be dishonorable, resorting to low tactics like investigating his opponent and threatening officials of U.S. Robots in order to get elected.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Lanning and Calvin go to visit Byerley, and Lanning asks him point blank if he is a robot. Byerley guesses that Quinn is the one who put Lanning up to this and is slightly irked, but he eats an apple in front of them to prove that he is not a robot. Calvin says, however, that this doesn’t prove that he is not a robot. He could be a very advanced robot, designed to do all of the things a human can do. Byerley says that Quinn simply wants to start a smear campaign against him, and Calvin and Lanning leave.
Calvin’s remark that Byerley could simply be a very advanced robot demonstrates just how sophisticated the robots have become, to the point where they are nearly indistinguishable from humans. This is a far cry from the non-verbal Robbie at the beginning of the book, and serves as a reminder of why the humans have a hard time understanding the robots as robots, because they have become more and more intelligent and humanlike.
Themes
Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, and Humanity Theme Icon
That night, when Byerley returns home, he greets a man named John in a wheelchair. Byerley carries John out into the garden for a walk and confesses that Quinn plans to accuse him of being a robot. Byerley then tells John that he has an idea to counteract Quinn’s claims.
This short exchange, which gives the reader a peek into Byerley’s background, provides some credence to Calvin’s later claims that Byerley is in fact a robot, as he is shown conspiring how to disprove Quinn—even though there are far easier ways to prove he is not a robot, such as violating one of the Three Laws.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, and Humanity Theme Icon
Get the entire I, Robot LitChart as a printable PDF.
I, Robot PDF
The next day, Calvin, Lanning, and Quinn meet again, and they report to Quinn that they saw Byerley eat. Calvin admits, however, that this does not prove he is not a robot. The two methods they can use to prove he is a robot are physical and psychological. He will probably not let them dissect or X-ray him, and so it would have to be psychological. If he is a robot, he must conform to the Three Laws of Robotics. If he breaks any of them, he is not a robot.
Asimov emphasizes (as he has many times in the story by this point) the fact that the Three Laws are an ironclad basis on which to prove someone is not a robot, because it is impossible for Byerley to break the Laws if he is, in fact, a robot. The Three Laws, as compared to any human code of ethics, are clearly much firmer.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Calvin continues, pointing out that there is no way to prove he is a robot based on the Three Laws, because “the three Rules of Robotics are the essential guiding principles of a good many of the world’s ethical systems.” If Byerley follows all of the laws, he may be a robot, or he “may simply be a very good man.”
Calvin’s reasoning essentially argues that robots are actually morally superior to humans, because any robot is equivalent to a “very good man” based on the ethical rules that they are obligated to follow.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Quotes
Lanning tries to examine evidence they may already have, as Byerley is a district attorney. Quinn remarks that Byerley boasts about having never prosecuted an innocent man. Lanning points out that he may not harm a human being whether innocent or guilty. But Calvin responds that if a robot came upon a madman that was trying to set a house on fire with people in it, the robot would try to stop the madman, even if it meant harming a human. Additionally, Byerley has not killed a man himself, he has simply given facts to others about the danger a person might pose to society, still adhering to the First Law. Byerley even speaks out against capital punishment.
Asimov once again illustrates the complexity of ethics, and how robots can become smarter and smarter in order to deal with these ethical dilemmas (the same is true of the dilemma in “Little Lost Robot”). It is true that Byerley is never proven a robot. But if he is a robot, as Calvin suspects, he illustrates how robots are gaining the intelligence not only to adhere to ethical principles, but to manipulate those ethical principles in a way that works for them.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, and Humanity Theme Icon
Quinn decides the next step is to try to find out what Byerley’s insides look like. A week before Byerley is to be nominated, Quinn leaks the news that he is a robot. There is no alternative candidate for Byerley’s party, and so he is still nominated, but there is “complete confusion” among the public. The Fundamentalists are in uproar, and U.S. Robots starts employing armed guards to protect itself. Stephen Byerley starts to surround himself with police.
Once again, fear and irrationality take hold of the public. They are worried what a robot might do in a position of power, yet as Calvin points out later in the story, robots are possibly more suited for political office than their human counterparts because of their ethics, level-headedness, and lack of corruption.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Irrationality, Fear, and Folly Theme Icon
One day, a man named Harroway appears at Byerley’s door and presents him with a court order that allows him to search the premises for the presence of mechanical men. Byerley allows the house to be searched, but when Harroway insists that they must also take an X-Ray of him, Byerley points out that the warrant doesn’t cover searching his body, and he refuses. He affirms that he has rights, and if they try to violate them, he will engage Harroway’s employer in a civil suit. Harroway leaves.
Harroway’s visit shows the distinctions between the humans and presumed robots in the story. Quinn is trying to violate Byerley’s right to privacy, putting him on shaky ethical ground. While it could be argued that a robot doesn’t have a right to privacy, the fact that Byerley is indistinguishable from a human to the outer world perhaps implies that robots could be treated as humans.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, and Humanity Theme Icon
After Harroway gets in his car, he checks a tiny mechanism in his pocket—a small X-ray camera. But when he presents the image to Quinn, he discovers that Byerley must have been wearing something that shielded his body from radiation, and therefore the picture could not be taken.
Again, Asimov highlights the tricks that Harroway and Quinn are resorting to in trying to “out” Byerley as a robot, and once again Byerley proves his superior intelligence and cunning in anticipating this tactic.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Human Superiority and Control Theme Icon
Byerley and Quinn speak over visorphone, and  Quinn threatens to reveal that Byerley wears this shield to the public. Byerley retorts that he will reveal that Quinn’s men attempted an illegal invasion of his right to privacy. Quinn then points out that there was a person missing from his house when they searched it. Byerley says that this is an old teacher of his who lives with him, but who is taking a vacation in the country. Quinn accuses the teacher of being the “real” Stephen Byerley, who created a robot version of himself after being injured in an automobile accident.
Quinn’s fears about Byerley not only stem from his belief that Byerley is a robot, but that Byerley is replacing a human being and could therefore win because of that fact. If the “real” Stephen Byerley has been paralyzed, he might never have won an election. But a robot version would be more likely to beat Quinn. Quinn is afraid that this means humans will start to have no chance against superior robots.
Themes
Human Superiority and Control Theme Icon
Irrationality, Fear, and Folly Theme Icon
Byerley denies Quinn’s claims, but thanks him for the  publicity. Quinn again affirms that Byerley is a robot and that the electorate knows it. Byerley responds that Quinn should relax if that’s the case, since it means that Quinn will win the election. Quinn hangs up. Later, John returns to the city a week before the election, but Byerley hides him in an obscure part of the city rather than in his home.
It is worth noting that Quinn’s fears may be what cost him the election. Had he run a fair fight, perhaps he could have had more of a chance. But because Byerley outwits him in proving that he is not a robot, Quinn dooms himself to defeat.
Themes
Irrationality, Fear, and Folly Theme Icon
Later, just before the election, Byerley makes a final speech in front of a roaring crowd. During the speech, a man approaches Byerley, and the crowd grows quiet. The man goads Byerley to hit him. Byerley at first refuses, saying that he has no issue with the man. The man accuses him of being a “monster” until Byerley punches the man in the face in front of the crowd. The man is stunned. Byerley apologizes, but this is enough to convince everyone that he is human.
The irony here is that Byerley must do an unethical thing in order to prove that he is a human being—and in order to get elected by the public. This warps the belief that humans are more ethical or compassionate than robots are.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Dr. Calvin and Stephen Byerley meet once more, a week before he takes office. Calvin explains Quinn’s theory to him fully, but Byerley points out that his ability to hit the man surely proved Quinn wrong. She tells him that she wishes he were a robot—a robot would be a better civil executive than a human, in her opinion. Byerley points out that a robot might fail due to the “inherent inadequacies of his brain.” Calvin makes a final point to Byerley: there is one time when a robot may strike a human being without breaking the First Law. That is when the human who is being hit is actually another robot.
Byerley’s election (after his proof of being human) also demonstrates how people are adamant at the idea that they don’t want a robot as a political leader, even though, as Calvin points out here, a robot might be better suited for it from an ethical standpoint. The irony in Byerley’s statements, of course, is that he likely is a robot, and is making a sophisticated argument against himself in order to maintain the fiction that he is a human.
Themes
Morality and Ethics Theme Icon
Human Superiority and Control Theme Icon
Quotes
Back with the reporter, Calvin says that when Byerley died, he had his body atomized so that there was never any legal proof. She still thinks he was a robot. But it didn’t matter to her: he was a good mayor. Five years later he became Regional Coordinator, and in 2044, he became the first World Coordinator. By that point, however, the Machines were already running the world, Calvin says.
Perhaps Byerley’s greatest achievement is not that he was able to come up with a strategy that could get him elected (if he were a robot), but that no one could ever discover the truth about him. This surely shows a mental superiority over the humans, who could never determine the truth.
Themes
Human Superiority and Control Theme Icon