Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl: Situational Irony 3 key examples

Jacobs often uses bits of scripture to satirize hypocritical white Christians, and this example is no exception. The white Christians don't seem to grasp the message of their own faith. They say "God is your Father, and all ye are brethren," but they do not treat Black people as brethren. Putting these words into action would require the white minister to recognize that enslaved people are equal humans who should be treated as such. Instead, the white minister's job in the wake of Nat Turner's Rebellion is to convince enslaved people that God means them to be enslaved. It is deeply ironic that the minister welcomes the enslaved people as "brethren" when white people have just demolished their church. Respecting people's religious freedom is supposed to be a fundamental part of what makes a good friend and neighbor in the United States. Enslavers do not want enslaved people to have religious freedom because Nat Turner's freedom to interpret Christianity through his own framework allowed him to lead a violent revolt based on the idea that slavery was a biblical apocalypse. Their only defense against a similar event involves misinterpreting scripture—something Jacobs points out because it makes clear that enslavers do not hold a defensible position.

In this and other moments like it, Jacobs exposes enslavers and white Christians more broadly as people who use Christianity as a tool of oppression instead of living by its teachings. Later on, Linda encounters Reverend Durham of the Bethel Church in Philadelphia. He provides a contrast to Reverend Pike and other white Christians the book satirizes. Instead of using religion to hurt people, he uses his position in the church to help people. This contrast drives home the fact that Jacobs does not have a problem with Christianity itself so much as the way it is practiced in much of the South.

Jacobs does not mean that Christianity is entirely foreign to Americans. Instead, she means that the version of Christianity delivered to both white and Black Americans in the South is a false version of the religion. Colonizers traditionally referred to people in colonized countries as "heathens" if they had not learned or accepted the teachings of Christianity. Missionaries supposedly teach Africans how to read the Bible, enabling them to follow Christianity straight from scripture. The irony Jacobs points out is that there are plenty of "heathens" at home. Literacy rates in the pre-Civil War South were extremely low. Enslavers who controlled the majority of the region's wealth thought that reading or writing might lead people (especially Black people, but also poor white people and others who did not benefit from slavery) to organize and rebel against them. Consequently, enslavers tried not to allow too many schools to operate in the South. Many people only knew scripture through the teachings of ministers, many of whom were paid by enslavers or were enslavers themselves. These ministers had an incentive to teach their followers that slavery was God's will.

This passage exposes the logic behind the entire enterprise of Christian proselytizing as a fallacy. If white Christian Americans were truly concerned about spreading the message of the Bible to as many people as possible, they would teach people at home what is actually in the Bible. Underlying this passage is a not-quite-explicit accusation: "Christian" missionary work abroad and at home alike is a scam. The focus of most of this work is on duping people into believing that Christianity justifies the institution of slavery. Through all this, Jacobs is careful not to alienate the reader who considers themself a true Christian. She herself believes in a truer version of Christianity, one that forbids its followers from treating one another as property. Rather than throw out Christianity altogether, she calls on "good" Christian readers to defend their religion by countering its perversion to justify the institution of slavery.

When Linda overhears Benny insisting to another child that Santa Claus brought the clothes, she feels opposite to how more privileged readers might expect a parent to feel when they hear that their child believes in Santa. Children whose parents teach them that Santa brings presents for Christmas generally only believe in the fiction of Santa until they are old enough to start questioning their parents' truthfulness. Disbelief in Santa is traditionally a sign of growing up. It is a loss of the kind of innocence that makes children trusting to a fault. Linda has done everything she can to protect her children since birth, but there is only so much she can do to protect the innocence of children who are legally enslaved. Benny has never had the luxury of being able to trust all the adults around him. He seems to insist that Santa is real for a different reason than most young children. Linda can't speak to her children or let them know where she is. Benny received new clothes from someone, and it is more plausible to him that the clothes are from Santa than that they are from the mother he believes has disappeared from his life.

There's additional irony in the fact that Linda actually is right there. She just can't communicate with Benny. This irony drives home the way enslavement breaks up families. Linda has to choose between the possibility of freedom (which she hopes to help her children attain one day too) and an ongoing relationship with her children while they are growing up. She chooses one traumatizing experience over another. Even if she had chosen not to go into hiding so that she could remain fully in her children's lives, their family could have been separated anyway at the whim of their enslavers. For enslaved people, the threat of family separation looms even when families do everything they can to stick together.