Lafayette in the Somewhat United States

by

Sarah Vowell

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Lafayette in the Somewhat United States makes teaching easy.

Lafayette in the Somewhat United States: Pages 60-125 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Meanwhile, Beaumarchais went undercover to stockpile more guns and ships—only to reveal his true identity when he saw a group of actors putting on a subpar production of his play, The Barber of Seville. The British complained to the French about this playwright-spy, and Beaumarchais had to stand down. However, by the time the British found out what was going on, Beaumarchais had already sent most of his supplies across the Atlantic.
In this silly anecdote, Vowell again reminds her readers that many Revolutionary War events were lucky or coincidental. If a bad play can change the course of history, then anything is possible. Rather than seeing the Patriot victory as a destined triumph, Vowell portrays the Revolution as a collection of human mistakes and successes.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
In other good news, Washington had just had his first success of the war. In December of 1776, the general led Patriot troops across the Delaware River in New Jersey to launch a sneak attack on the Hessians (Germans who were under temporary hire as British soldiers). Though Washington’s victory had little tactical effect, it cheered the rebellious colonists and prompted the French to offer up even more of their resources.
This early victory—the subject of the famous painting Washington Crossing the Delaware—shows the importance of symbolic success for the Patriot forces. Even when they could not reclaim large chunks of land, the Americans’ show of force and resilience was enough to win them the French support they needed to go keep going.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
The French sent guns, but they also sent high-ranking officials and engineers (including Pierre L’Enfant, who would later plan the city of Washington, D.C.). Some of these military men wanted to unseat George Washington as Commander in Chief and pressured Silas Deane to allow them to do so. Lafayette also went through Deane—but unlike some of his older, more titled counterparts, Lafayette had nothing but respect for the American generals he planned to serve.   
Just as the nation’s founders debated laws and political principles, they also fought even pettier, more personal battles—especially over who got to command the Patriot forces. Also of note is that D.C., the capital of the U.S., was designed by a Frenchman. This is yet another example of France’s role in shaping American life.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
When Noailles learned of his son-in-law Lafayette’s plans, he forbade Lafayette and his young friends from crossing the Atlantic. To appease Noailles, Lafayette—stubborn as ever—pretended to drop the idea of joining the war. He even took a quick trip to England, where he talked about revolution with important British officials like General Henry Clinton (the man who would later be put in charge of the whole Redcoat operation). But on his way back from England, rather than returning to his wife’s home, Lafayette instead snuck onto the Victory, a ship he had purchased for the express purpose of going to America.
Lafayette’s fly-by-night escape from France is perhaps the most obvious evidence of the fact that as a 19-year-old, Lafayette was not yet a responsible decision-maker. To this wealth French teen, the war was more of a game than anything. In this passage, he essentially plays hide-and-seek with the French nobility. 
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Get the entire Lafayette in the Somewhat United States LitChart as a printable PDF.
Lafayette in the Somewhat United States PDF
Lafayette’s secret exit horrified Noailles and upset Adrienne, his now very pregnant wife. For his part, Lafayette’s guilt about leaving his wife did cause him to return to France—but only briefly. All it took was one royal aide encouraging Lafayette to head to America, and he was off again, going to Spain and then across the Atlantic. Vowell surmises that Lafayette’s antics can be attributed to the fact that as a teenager, his prefrontal cortex (the part of the brain that assesses risk) had yet to be fully formed.
There are two important things to take in here. First, Lafayette is willing to put a country he has never even visited above his wife and unborn child; like many men of the Revolutionary generation, he prioritized glory and ideological pride over any domestic bonds. Second, Lafayette’s immaturity at the beginning of his journey parallels the immaturity of the new United States, which had yet to come together into a unified whole.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Lafayette had endless faith in the new American republic: he saw the nation as a “sure refuge of virtue, of honesty, of tolerance, of equality.” Vowell points out that he was overly optimistic, as U.S. history (from the brutal treatment of indigenous peoples to the Chinese Exclusion Act) is defined by intolerance and a lack of equality. At the same time, despite his naivete and his desire for glory, Lafayette’s promise that he was “coming as a friend” would prove true for the next 40 years. And while Lafayette was a hero on the battlefield, he also performed a host of “dull grown-up kindness” (like arranging trade agreements) later on.
Just as Jefferson used the word “equal” in the Declaration of Independence, Lafayette marveled at the seeming sense of “equality” that he witnessed in America. In both cases, this rhetoric of equal rights obscured the inequality at the very foundation of U.S. history—the mass murder of indigenous peoples and the practice of slavery. Though Lafayette may initially have been naïve, despite his private abolitionist views, he did not ever use his position as a “friend” of the nation to push for an end to slavery.
Themes
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
After a long, nauseating voyage, Lafayette at last arrived in Charleston, South Carolina on June 13, 1777. Though the city was hot and filled with mosquitoes, Lafayette thought it was the most wonderful place he had ever been. He was particularly taken with the sense that in America, “all citizens were brothers.”
Again, the claim that “all citizens were brothers” ignores just how many people were denied citizenship—and brotherhood—because of race or gender at this time. Furthermore, Lafayette’s use of the word “brothers” shows that he is already beginning to think about his fellow revolutionaries as a surrogate family.
Themes
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Lafayette and his associates then began the long, difficult journey north toward Pennsylvania (all of which Lafayette paid for). Though many of his comrades complained of the physical hardship, Lafayette’s letters to Adrienne were filled only with praise for the “vast forests and immense rivers” he encountered. He also, again, celebrated the sense of equality he felt with all those around him—though Vowell points out that “only a white guy” could feel that way. 
Throughout the book, Vowell is fascinated by the gap between beautiful landscapes—in this case, those “vast forest”—and the horrible things that took place in them. While Lafayette praises America’s natural beauty, echoing the pastoral image that most Europeans had of the New World, he ignores the human horrors (primarily slavery) taking place around him.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
After a 32-day trek to Pennsylvania, Lafayette hoped that the Continental Congress would rejoice at his arrival. Instead, they dismissed him; the Patriot politicians were sick of fancy Frenchmen (many of them sent by Silas Deane) coming over and demanding a high-ranking office. As Washington put it, “these men have no attachments or ties to the country.”
Lafayette was not the only Frenchman hungry for glory—in fact, many such men had already tried to join the war effort. In a revolution so founded on a shared pride and belief in this new nation, the French soldiers’ lack of “attachment” was particularly frustrating.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
One particularly egregious case of this was when Phillipe Du Courdray, a high-status Frenchman, tried to unseat the American Henry Knox. Knox was a Boston bookseller whose business was gravely affected by the Intolerable Acts (a steep 1774 British tax). When the British moved to attack Boston in March of 1776, Knox was able to sneak away to Fort Ticonderoga in New York, where many of the Patriots’ weapons were held. Knox then smuggled the weapons thousands of miles—overnight—up to Boston, allowing the Americans to fend off the encroaching Redcoats. The idea that such a man as Knox could be replaced by a French stranger was therefore ridiculous.
The conflict between Du Courdray and Knox, in which a titled Frenchman tried to unseat an iconic American hero, would repeat itself later with Washington and French general Thomas Conway. Ultimately, men like Knox and Washington—the first American celebrities of sorts—would triumph over their more titled French counterparts. But the fact that there was even a question shows just how much the United States needed to stay on good terms with the French, even if it meant upsetting homegrown war heroes.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Still, Congress was hesitant about annoying the French but ignoring Du Courdray (who claimed that he was much closer to Louis XVI than he actually was). Eventually, the entire debacle was sorted out, but it made Congress skeptical about rewarding Lafayette with a fancy title. It was only when Lafayette promised to serve “at his own expense” and “as a volunteer” that the Patriots agreed to let him join. From his first moments in the U.S., Vowell comments, Lafayette seemed to have “vomited up his adolescent petulance,” emerging as a more thoughtful and mature man than he had been on the European side of the Atlantic.
Lafayette’s selflessness is uncharacteristic, especially when compared to his actions of only a few months before (when he skipped out on his pregnant wife to come to America). If this book is, in part, Lafayette’s coming-of-age story, his decision to volunteer himself is a pivotal moment in his growth. 
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
After speaking with Congress, Lafayette met with Washington and found himself instantly amazed by the famed general. The two men became fast friends, especially once Washington asked Lafayette to “consider himself at all times as one of his family.” For the orphaned teenager, this kind of father figure was exactly what he had been looking for.
Lafayette had just abandoned his flesh-and-blood family back in France, but as someone from a long line of soldiers, perhaps the teenager was craving a particular kind of wartime bond. Plus, the fact that Washington described Lafayette as “one of his family” suggests that many Patriots were starting to think more readily of their fellow soldiers as family members.
Themes
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Lafayette hoped that eventually he would stop being a volunteer and gain an actual title, which made for some awkwardness with Washington. But the awkwardness was overcome when once Lafayette saw how outmatched the Patriots were; many of them had only torn hunting shirts instead of proper uniforms, for example. Yet rather than critique Washington’s work, Lafayette embraced this raggedness as yet another example of a kind of uniquely American “virtue.”
Hunting shirts are an important symbol throughout Vowell’s work. On the one hand, these torn shirts show how few resources the Patriots had to work with. But on the other hand, the fact that the Americans were willing to stand and fight even without the proper attire shows their passion for democracy, a kind of idyllic “virtue” that would inspire their allies abroad.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Besides, while there was lots of internal conflict on the colonists’ side, the British were far from unified in their fight against the Patriots. Most crucially, British Commander in Chief William Howe had a plan to attack the Patriots at Albany from all sides, but Parliament refused to give him the troops he needed to accomplish this goal. Howe decided to change course and attack Philadelphia, but the officials in London never comprehended this plan, either, leading to a lot of tactical confusion on the British side.
Infighting constantly threatened to derail the American forces, but poor communication was an issue for the British as well. Several years later, the Redcoat generals’ inability to communicate with one another at Yorktown would result in the Americans winning the war.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Meanwhile, Washington was coming to terms with his troops’ inherent weakness. (“Are these the men with which I am to defend America?” he once famously asked.) Stressed and overworked, Washington decided to embrace what is known as the Fabian strategy, in which one army continually retreats, hoping to outlast an opponent and therefore eventually defeat them. When Washington realized that Howe was planning to attack Philadelphia, he decided to apply this strategy and let the new nation’s capital be slowly taken by the British.
Washington’s decision to employ the Fabian strategy demonstrates just how dire the Patriot situation really was. Though it was likely a wise tactical choice, many members of Congress were frustrated and humiliated that Washington kept pushing their troops to retreat. This conflict between politicians and the Commander in Chief would continue to bubble up throughout the war.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
In 2013, Vowell revisits the Brandywine countryside, the part of Pennsylvania in which Washington fought a brutal battle with General Howe. Vowell is surprised to find that the once-famous site now is occupied by a combination Pizza Hut-Taco Bell. Additionally, the Battle of Brandywine was fought in the winter, and Vowell is visiting in the spring. It is hard for her to process that centuries ago, these lush fields were the site of such violence. Plus, Vowell has to contend with Nick, the very grumpy tour guide she’s hired.
Though the Revolutionary War was a time of great violence, illness, and death, that history isn’t very tangible in today’s United States. Vowell is repeatedly struck by the fact that former battlefields have become suburbs or peaceful valleys. The fact that these sites go unmarked, instead appearing as picturesque fields, symbolizes how the history of the American Revolution has been rewritten. The violence and conflict necessary for American victory has largely been smoothed over, replaced with a simpler narrative of ideological triumph.   
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Though the Battle of Brandywine is famous mostly for the mistakes that both Washington and Howe made, Vowell is en route to a surprisingly festive celebration of this fateful battle. Vowell is amused that contemporary Pennsylvanians are able to celebrate a battle that was far from victorious for the Americans. The Patriots lost here, largely because the lush hills around Brandywine allowed the British Redcoats to conceal their identities—and launch a sneak attack.
In an even more obvious case of rewriting history, war reenactors make a festive day out of was once a moment of great hardship for Patriot forces. Here and elsewhere, Vowell draws attention to the gap between historical reality and how history is commemorated today, with reenactors and other sources telling a celebratory narrative that glosses over the war’s complicated, violent reality.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
Vowell takes a break in the Brandywine River Museum, where she sneaks a glance at painter Andrew Wyeth’s depictions of the region. Even aided by maps and GPS technology, Vowell has struggled to find her way through Brandywine, and she can only imagine Washington had an even harder time. Vowell wonders if the British ambush at Brandywine reminded Washington of his brutal loss at Long Island, giving him the worst kind of déjà vu.
Though Lafayette and his contemporaries often complimented the pastoral beauty of the American landscape, that same landscape could also prove tactically difficult. This passage also speaks to how Vowell works as a historian: she uses physical landscape and present-day sense association to try to understand how historical figures like Washington must have felt about the pivotal events in their lives.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
But Lafayette, always hungry for glory and ready for blood, nevertheless begged Washington to allow him to join the fray. The Patriots’ Fabian strategy was supposed to be an orderly retreat, but instead, the soldiers were fleeing at random, leading to deadly confusion. As more and more Americans deserted, Lafayette started using his body to block the exits from the battlefield—and wound up getting shot in the leg in the process. When Lafayette went to get his bullet hole treated, Washington told the doctor to “take care of him as if he were my own son.”
Lafayette’s time at Brandywine showcases both his increased maturity and his youthful recklessness. His loyalty and determination to help Washington were signs of selflessness, but his determination to find glory (even if it meant getting shot) was less wise. Still, the surrogate father-son relationship that Lafayette so coveted with Washington was growing stronger by the day.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Then and now, Brandywine was and is Quaker country, and Vowell ends up at a Quaker meeting. Quakers are known for their belief in nonviolence—though one of the most important generals in the American Revolution was Nathanael Greene, known as the “Fighting Quaker” because he abandoned his faith and joined several local New England militias. Vowell wants to talk about Greene, but the Quakers at the meeting prefer to remember just how much regular civilians suffered during the war. Both armies plundered food and goods from the quiet citizens of the Brandywine valley.
Vowell’s time with the Quakers is a useful reminder of the very real, very human consequences of the war. While men like Lafayette were chasing victory and fame, everyday farmers were finding their fields destroyed—meaning that they were no longer able to feed their families.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Vowell chats with Christopher Densmore, whom she later learns is one of the country’s most important Quaker scholars. Densmore explains that he views the history of the United States as a history of war, but Vowell disagrees. Instead, informed by her training as an art historian, Vowell prefers to explore American history through artifacts, monuments and “found objects.” Densmore criticizes this view, and Vowell jokes that though Quakers are wise, they often are “a little more honest than the situation calls for.”
This passage is important for several reasons. First, though Vowell does not agree with Densmore’s view of U.S. history as one defined by conflict, war did play a central role in the nation’s very founding. Second of all, Vowell’s background as an art historian—and her commitment to a history told through “found objects”— reveals her unique methodology, which grounds history in present-day spaces.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Though they disagree on some things, Vowell and Densmore share their concern that Americans are forgetting their own history—for example, more than half of U.S. citizens incorrectly believe that the Civil War came before the Revolution.
Just as the lush fields at Brandywine symbolize Americans’ ability to gloss over the bloodshed in their own history, the tendency to think of  the Civil War as an earlier event than the American Revolution is yet another way in which Americans revise history (even unintentionally).
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Vowell travels to a nearby monument for Lafayette, commemorating the blood he lost at Brandywine. As she reads the quotes inscribed on the monument, Vowell once more comes to terms with how much Lafayette seemed to seek out danger. He greeted gunshot almost with excitement, because it meant that he was finally a part of the war’s real action. And again, Vowell is struck by the juxtaposition of the peaceful fields with their violent past: “there would be no indication of the mayhem that went down here,” she muses, “unless this Lafayette doodad marked the spot.”
Since he was a little boy hunting for a mysterious beast in Auvergne, Lafayette has loved taking risks. But while the present-day U.S. loves to valorize and commemorate individual risk-takers like Lafayette, there are few memorials to the anonymous soldiers who fought and died in revolutionary “mayhem.”
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
It’s time for the battle reenactment, and Vowell marvels at Americans’ ability to convert sad historical events into happy summertime celebrations. She watches a well-researched puppet show about Lafayette’s life, and she hears some war reenactors talk about their wives’ resentment of their historical hobbies. Many of the men acting as Patriots are wearing the shoddy hunting shirts that, at least to Lafayette, symbolized both the colonists’ virtue and their lack of preparedness.
In the 18th century, men like Lafayette and Silas Deane left their wives to go wage the Revolution, and today, 21st-century men leave their wives to go reenact that war. And again, this reenactment signals the contemporary desire to make U.S. history seem more lighthearted and celebratory than it actually was.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Off to the side, Vowell notices a woman winding yarn, dressed in Revolutionary garb to reenact this less flashy part of history. Though nobody pays much attention to this woman, her actions have great historical significance. When the British raised taxes on imports, the colonists created non-importation agreements as a form of protest. As part of this protest, many women began making their own yarn and sewing their own garments in what was known as the Homespun Movement. Homespun clothes then became an international symbol of America’s folksy strength; Washington eventually wore a homespun suit to his inauguration. And Ben Franklin went even further, wearing a simple fur cap to all of his fancy French meetings as way of advertising (and overplaying) America’s pastoral values.
The story Vowell tells of Lafayette, Washington, and the like is dominated by men. But here, she focuses on how women were able to aid the war effort even within the domestic sphere that they were largely confined to in the 1700s. It is also important to note that the pastoral, “homespun” image of Americans—as symbolized by Franklin’s fur cap and the recurring hunting shirts—was, in part, an intentional, political statement on the part of the women who made those clothes.
Themes
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon