On Liberty

by

John Stuart Mill

Themes and Colors
Liberty and Authority Theme Icon
Individuality vs. Conformity Theme Icon
Social Tyranny and Custom Theme Icon
Morality, New Ideas, and Progress Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in On Liberty, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Social Tyranny and Custom Theme Icon

John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty primarily deals with the relationship between individual liberty and authority—but not just political authority. Mill believes that social prejudice, narrow-mindedness, and general resistance to change can be even more dangerous to individual liberty than corrupt political tyrants and restrictive laws. Through social tyranny (or the “tyranny of the majority”), individual men and women are told what is socially acceptable to do and say at different times and in different places. These prescribed formulas for behavior and speech are called customs, and changing a social custom is immensely difficult. In On Liberty, Mill examines the role social tyranny and custom have in hindering a society’s collective ability to move forward and improve itself.

When one thinks of a tyrant, the image that comes to mind is usually one person in charge of an entire nation or state. However, Mill believes that society itself can be a tyrant. Most people—especially Mill’s 19th-century audience—fear social stigma and ostracization, and so individual men and women are often all too willing to conform to the expectations and customs of their society. Because of this, Mill explains, society can be “the tyrant—society collectively, over the separate individuals who compose it.” Moreover, “social tyranny [can be] more formidable than many kinds of political oppression.” When one is trapped in a politically oppressive environment, one can at least turn to like-minded neighbors and friends for comfort and to vent; however, there are fewer chances to escape from social tyranny because it is inflicted on society, by society.

Out of fear of social ostracization, many people simply adopt the social customs that dictate acceptable behavior. However, this comes at a price: because so many people blindly adhere to social customs in their everyday lives, they cease to think for themselves. Mill writes, “He who does anything because it is the custom, makes no choice.” This means that those who act and say only what custom deems appropriate aren’t taking an active role in their own lives. They are passively accepting their role, rather than taking the active step of making an informed choice about what to do. Mill reinforces this point when he says of people who simply adhere to custom, “Their thinking is done for them.” This highlights how social tyranny uses customs to discourage most people from thinking for themselves because the few who do think have already provided the rest of society with acceptable answers and opinions. Perhaps more importantly, Mill points out that “Customs are made for customary circumstances.” This means that customs are meant for average day-to-day events, but they don’t help anyone who might face unique problems; therefore, those who put all their faith into social customs and comparatively little into individual thought will have a difficult time successfully navigating their personal problems or relationships.

Although social customs might be comfortable because so many people follow them, they threaten a society’s ability to advance or better itself because so few people are willing to do or say anything that violate customs. Mill describes custom as “unceasing antagonism to that disposition to aim at something better than customary, which is called […] the spirit of liberty.” Because of the stigma attached to those who violate custom, few people dare to share innovative ideas or plans that might help society better itself. The only way for a society to break away from the tyranny of custom is through “nonconformity, the mere refusal to bend the knee to custom.” In other words, when individuals refuse to do as custom dictates, they help set a precedent that will inspire others to adopt their own individual methods and ideas as well. Above all, Mill advocates for “protection […] against the tyranny of prevailing opinion and feeling.” This can be achieved by encouraging rather than discouraging people to consciously challenge customs that go against their natural inclinations or beliefs.

People are frequently faced with an impossible choice: either adhere to social custom and avoid the consequences of going against the grain, or break with custom and be rejected by society. Social tyranny works by imposing strict customs and discouraging individuals from embracing any of their natural talents or thoughts that go against the social grain. However, breaking with these customs—even when it means social ostracization—is the first step toward progress, which is why Mill encourages his readers to reject following any and all customs that aren’t in keeping with their natural impulses.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

Social Tyranny and Custom ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of Social Tyranny and Custom appears in each chapter of On Liberty. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
chapter length:
Get the entire On Liberty LitChart as a printable PDF.
On Liberty PDF

Social Tyranny and Custom Quotes in On Liberty

Below you will find the important quotes in On Liberty related to the theme of Social Tyranny and Custom.
Chapter 1 Quotes

What was now wanted was, that the rulers should be identified with the people; that their interest and will should be the interest and will of the nation. The nation did not need to be protected against its own will. There was no fear of its tyrannizing over itself. Let the rulers be effectually responsible to it, promptly removable by it, and it could afford to trust them with power of which it could itself dictate the use to be made. Their power was but the nation’s own power, concentrated, and in a form convenient for exercise.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 9
Explanation and Analysis:

The ‘people’ who exercise the power are not always the same people with those over whom it is exercised; and the ‘self-government’ spoken of is not the government of each by himself, but of each by all the rest. The will of the people, moreover, practically means the will of the most numerous or the most active part of the people; the majority, or those who succeed in making themselves accepted as the majority; the people, consequently, may desire to oppress a part of their number; and precautions are as much needed against this as against any other abuse of power.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 10
Explanation and Analysis:

Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, thought not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself. Protection, therefore, against the tyranny of the magistrate is not enough: there needs protection also against the tyranny of the prevailing opinion and feeling; against the tendency of society to impose, by other means than civil penalties, its own ideas and practices as rules of conduct on those who dissent from them; to fetter the development, and, if possible, prevent the formation, of any individuality not in harmony with its ways, and compel all characters to fashion themselves upon the model of its own.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 10-11
Explanation and Analysis:
Chapter 2 Quotes

Let us suppose, therefore, that the government is entirely at one with the people, and never thinks of exerting any power of coercion unless in agreement with what it conceives to be their voice. But I deny the right of the people to exercise such coercion, either by themselves or by their government. The power itself is illegitimate. The best government has no more title to it than the worst. It is as noxious, or more noxious, when exerted in accordance with public opinion than when in opposition to it. If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. […] But the peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 23
Explanation and Analysis:

First: the opinion which it is attempted to suppress by authority may possibly be true. Those who desire to suppress it, of course deny its truth; but they are not infallible. They have no authority to decide the question for all mankind, and exclude every other person from the means of judging. To refuse a hearing to an opinion, because they are sure that it is false, is to assume that their certainty is the same thing as absolute certainty. All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility. Its condemnation may be allowed to rest on this common argument, not the worse for being common.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 24
Explanation and Analysis:

Our merely social intolerance kills no one, roots out no opinions, but induces men to disguise them, or to abstain from any active effort for their diffusion. With us, heretical opinions do not perceptibly gain, or even lose, ground in each decade or generation; they never blaze out far and wide, but continue to smoulder in the narrow circles of thinking and studious persons among whom they originate, without ever lighting up the general affairs of mankind with either a true or a deceptive light.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 39
Explanation and Analysis:

The greatest harm done is to those who are not heretics, and whose whole mental development is cramped, and their reason cowed, by the fear of heresy. Who can compute what the world loses in the multitude of promising intellects combined with timid characters, who dare not follow out any bold, vigorous, independent train of thought, lest it should land them in something which would admit of being considered irreligious or immoral?

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 40
Explanation and Analysis:

He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them; who defend them in earnest, and do their very utmost for them. He must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form; he must feel the whole force of the difficulty which the truth view of the subject has to encounter and dispose of; else he will never really possess himself of the portion of truth which meets and removes that difficulty. Ninety-nine in a hundred of what are called educated men are in this condition; even of those who can argue fluently for their opinions. Their conclusion may be true, but it might be false for anything they know: they have never thrown themselves into the mental position of those who think different from them, and considered what such persons may have to say; and consequently they do not, in any proper sense of the word, know the doctrine which they themselves profess.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 44
Explanation and Analysis:
Chapter 3 Quotes

Thirdly, though the customs be both good as customs, and suitable to him, yet to conform to custom, merely as custom, does not educate or develope in him any of the qualities which are the distinctive endowment of a human being. The human faculties of perception, judgment, discriminative feeling, mental activity, and even moral preference, are exercised only in making a choice. He who does anything because it is the custom, makes no choice. He gains no practice either in discerning or in desiring what is best. The mental and moral, like the muscular powers, are improved only by being used. The faculties are called into no exercise by doing a thing merely because others do it, no more than by believing a thing only because others believe it.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 67
Explanation and Analysis:

It will probably be conceded that it is desirable people should exercise their understandings, and that an intelligent following of custom, or even occasionally an intelligent deviation from custom, is better than a blind and simply mechanical adhesion to it. To a certain extent it is admitted, that our understanding should be our own: but there is not the same willingness to admit that our desires and impulses should be our own likewise; or that to possess impulses of our own, and of any strength, is anything but a peril and a snare. Yet desires and impulses are as much a part of a perfect human being, as beliefs and restraints: and strong impulses are only perilous when not properly balanced; when one set of aims and inclinations is developed into strength, while others, which ought to co-exist with them, remain weak and inactive. It is not because men’s desires are strong that they act ill; it is because their consciences are weak.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 68
Explanation and Analysis:

In our times, from the highest class of society down to the lowest, every one lives as under the eye of a hostile and dreaded censorship. Not only in what concerns others, but in what concerns only themselves, the individual or the family do not ask themselves—what do I prefer? or, what would suit my character and disposition? […] They ask themselves, what is suitable to my position? what is usually done by persons of my station and pecuniary circumstances? or (worse still) what is usually done by persons of a station and circumstances superior to mine? I do not mean that they choose what is customary, in preference to what suits their own inclination. It does not occur to them to have any inclination, except for what is customary. Thus the mind itself is bowed to the yoke: even in what people do for pleasure, conformity is the first thing thought of; they like in crowds; they exercise choice only among things commonly done: peculiarity of taste, eccentricity of conduct, are shunned equally with crimes: until by dint of not following their own nature, they have no nature to follow: their human capacities are withered and starved: they become incapable of any strong wishes or native pleasures, and are generally without either opinions or feelings of home growth, or properly their own. Now is this, or is it not, the desirable condition of human nature?

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 70
Explanation and Analysis:

In this age, the mere example of nonconformity, the mere refusal to bend the knee to custom, is itself a service. Precisely because the tyranny of opinion is such as to make eccentricity a reproach, it is desirable, in order to break through that tyranny, that people should be eccentric. Eccentricity has always abounded when and where strength of character has abounded; and the amount of eccentricity in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental vigour, and moral courage which it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric, marks the chief danger of the time.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 76
Explanation and Analysis:

There is one characteristic of the present direction of public opinion, peculiarly calculated to make it intolerant of any marked demonstration of individuality. The general average of mankind are not only moderate in intellect, but also moderate in inclinations: they have no tastes or wishes strong enough to incline them to do anything unusual, and they consequently do not understand those who have, and class all such with the wild and intemperate whom they are accustomed to look down upon. […] These tendencies of the times cause the public to be more disposed than at most former periods to prescribe general rules of conduct, and endeavor to make every one conform to the approved standard. And that standard, express or tacit, is to be without any marked character; to maim by compression […] every part of human nature which stands out prominently, and tends to make the person markedly dissimilar in outline to commonplace humanity.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 78-79
Explanation and Analysis:
Chapter 4 Quotes

If he displeases us, we may express our distaste, and we may stand aloof from a person as well as from a thing that displeases us; but we shall not therefore feel called on to make his life uncomfortable. We shall reflect that he already bears, or will bear, the whole penalty of his error; if he spoils his life by mismanagement, we shall not, for that reason, desire to spoil it still further; instead of wishing to punish him, we shall rather endeavor to alleviate his punishment, by showing him how he may avoid or cure the evils his conduct tends to bring upon him. He may be to us an object of pity, perhaps of dislike, but not of anger or resentment; we shall not treat him like an enemy of society: the worst we shall think ourselves justified in doing is leaving him to himself, if we do not interfere benevolently by showing interest or concern for him.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 90
Explanation and Analysis:

If there be among those whom it is attempted to coerce into prudence or temperance, any of the material of which vigorous and independent characters are made, they will infallibly rebel against the yoke. No such person will ever feel that others have a right to control him in his concerns, such as they have to prevent him from injuring them in theirs; and it easily comes to be considered a mark of spirit and courage to fly in the face of such usurped authority, and do with ostentation the exact opposite of what it enjoins[.]

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 94
Explanation and Analysis:

A theory of ‘social rights’, the like of which probably never before found its way into distinct language: being nothing short of this—that it is the absolute social right of every individual, that every other individual shall act in every respect exactly as he ought; that whosoever fails thereof in the smallest particular, violates my social right, and entitles me to demand from the legislature the removal of the grievance. So monstrous a principle is far more dangerous than any single interference with liberty; there is no violation of liberty which it would not justify; it acknowledges no right to any freedom whatever, except perhaps to that of holding opinions in secret, without ever disclosing them: for, the moment an opinion which I consider noxious passes any one’s lips, it invades all the ‘social rights’ attribute to me by the Alliance. The doctrine ascribes to all mankind a vested interest in each other’s moral, intellectual, and even physical perfection, to be defined by each claimant according to his own standard.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 101
Explanation and Analysis:
Chapter 5 Quotes

A person should be free to do as he likes in his own concerns; but he ought not to be free to do as he likes in acting for another, under the pretext that the affairs of the other are his own affairs. The State, while it respects the liberty of each in what specially regards himself, is bound to maintain a vigilant control over his exercise of any power which it allows him to possess over others. This obligation is almost entirely disregarded in the case of the family relations, a case, in its direct influence on human happiness, more important than all others taken together. The almost despotic power of husbands over wives needs not be enlarged upon here, because nothing more is needed for the complete removal of the evil, than that wives should have the same rights, and should receive the protection of law in the same manner, as all other persons; and because, on this subject, the defenders of established injustice do not avail themselves of the plea of liberty, but stand forth openly as the champions of power.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Related Symbols: Marriage
Page Number: 118
Explanation and Analysis:

The objections which are urged with reason against State education, do not apply to the enforcement of education by the State, but to the State’s taking upon itself to direct that education: which is a totally different thing. That the whole or any large part of the education of the people should be in State hands, I go as far as any one in deprecating. All that has been said of the importance of individuality of character, and diversity in opinions and modes of conduct, involves, as of the same unspeakable importance, diversity of education. A general State education is a mere contrivance for moulding people to be exactly like one another: and as the mould in which it casts them is that which pleases the predominant power in the government, whether this be a monarch, a priesthood, an aristocracy, or the majority of the existing generation, in proportion as it is efficient and successful, it establishes a despotism over the mind, leading by natural tendency to one over the body.

Related Characters: John Stuart Mill (speaker)
Page Number: 119
Explanation and Analysis: