LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in On Tyranny, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Collapse of American Democracy
Tyranny and the Consolidation of Power
Political Action and Civic Responsibility
History and Memory
Summary
Analysis
Authoritarians love emergencies that provide them with an opportunity to seize power and destroy democratic institutions. Famously, after the Reichstag (Germany’s parliament building) mysteriously caught on fire in 1933, Hitler declared an emergency in order to grab power. He suspended people’s rights and started detaining opponents by blaming them for the fire, and then the parliament gave him absolute, unlimited power to do whatever he wanted. Germany spent more than a decade in this “state of emergency,” slaughtering millions in the process.
So far, Snyder has repeatedly emphasized how authoritarian governments secure power bit by bit, gradually eroding their opposition, civic institutions, and citizens’ sense of truth and reality. However, at a certain point, these gradual efforts are successful enough to permit an authoritarian government to suddenly and irreversibly grab power. By making the “state of emergency” permanent, Hitler destroyed all semblance of democracy in Germany, until his regime fell. In short, tyranny takes control of a society just like Ernest Hemingway famously said that people go bankrupt: “gradually and then suddenly.” Stopping tyranny is far easier in the first, gradual stage—but citizens must have some idea of “the unthinkable” that is to come.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Russian dictator Vladimir Putin came to power in similar circumstances: Russia’s own secret police set off bombs around the country, and then Putin started a civil war against the Chechen Muslims he blamed for the attacks. Then, Putin used further terrorist attacks as excuses to destroy checks and balances like privately owned television stations and the powers of regional governors. Russia has used this narrative of terrorism to try and destabilize the rest of the world: it used it to justify invading Ukraine in 2014, created fake cyberthreats against France and Germany to make Europeans afraid of Muslim refugees, and then bombed Syrian civilians to ensure that refugees would seek asylum in Europe.
Putin’s use of “terror management” shows how authoritarians can also combine the tactic of manufactured emergencies (or the principle that “one moment of shock enables an eternity of submission”) with the strategy of gradually eroding checks and balances. Like the Reichstag fire in Germany, the conveniently timed, manufactured terrorist attacks were cynically designed to convince the public that there was an enemy that needed to be defeated and they needed to place faith in the government in order to do so. In other words, it created a sense of a warlike national mission for Russian citizens, when its real motive was to help Putin secure greater and greater power. As Putin’s government continues using these same disinformation and false terrorism tactics to gain empire-like influence throughout the world, it spreads the same violence against minorities and antidemocratic disorder that it has sown inside its borders.
Active
Themes
Donald Trump openly supports Vladimir Putin’s government and antidemocratic “terror management” tactics. Like tyrants throughout history, Trump and Putin sees that “one moment of shock enables an eternity of submission.” Citizens must identify and fight this tendency.
The Russian government launched a similar disinformation campaign in the United States to help Donald Trump win the 2016 election, and Snyder has been a constant, vocal critic of this violation of sovereignty, as well as Trump’s deep ties to Russia. In fact, he devoted his next book to the subject (The Road to Unfreedom, 2018).