Slaughterhouse-Five

by

Kurt Vonnegut

Slaughterhouse-Five: Situational Irony 2 key examples

Chapter 1
Explanation and Analysis—Death for Theft?:

When Vonnegut as narrator is describing the climax of the book he hopes to write, he describes the ironic execution of a man for stealing a teapot:

“I think the climax of the book will be the execution of poor old Edgar Derby,” I said. “The irony is so great. A whole city gets burned down, and thousands and thousands of people are killed. And then this one American foot soldier is arrested in the ruins for taking a teapot. And he’s given a regular trial, and then he’s shot by a firing squad.”

The narrator is talking to fellow former soldier Bernard O'Hare about the book he will write on Dresden, a meta-reference to Slaughterhouse-Five itself. As the narrator self-referentially identifies, the situation is ironic. The irony is a product of the situation's absurdity: stealing a teapot results in the death penalty immediately after thousands were killed in a massive firebombing. The irony reveals the seemingly arbitrary nature of death and destruction during war time; there is no rhyme or reason to who lives or dies.

There are a myriad of similarly ironic moments throughout the novel. Vonnegut often uses irony to bring a sense of humor to the seriousness of war, and to almost mock the notion of war itself, which is riddled with contradictions and absurdities. The actual climax of the novel is not necessarily the execution of Edgar Derby, but rather is the bombing of Dresden and the subsequent burning of the bodies. Regardless, the ironic execution of Derby reminds the reader that death comes for everyone—a soldiers, civilians, and thieves alike. Similarly, the death of one man can appear unjust next to the equally arbitrary slaughter of thousands. But, as Billy Pilgrim would say, so it goes.

Chapter 6
Explanation and Analysis—Pilgrim the Princess:

Billy Pilgrim takes the place of Cinderella in a moment of situational irony in Chapter 6:

The boots fit perfectly. Billy Pilgrim was Cinderella, and Cinderella was Billy Pilgrim.

The scene is an allusion to fairy tale of Cinderella, which was just performed by the English prisoners of war. In the fairy tale, Prince Charming identified Cinderella through the fit of her shoe, and Vonnegut is playfully referencing that moment as Billy finally finds a new pair of shoes that fit him. The moment is situationally ironic because Billy Pilgrim is currently a prisoner of war in enemy territory. He is, in other words, in a terrible situation, a far cry from being a princess swept off of her feet by a charming prince. The sheer absurdity of the reference makes it darkly humorous.

And yet, Pilgrim is in some ways chosen by fate. He manages to survive the war against all odds, when most of his fellow soldiers are killed in one way or another. He was also the lone survivor of a plane crash. Cinderella, through the help of some magic, is saved from her destitute life against all odds; similarly, things just seem to work out for Billy Pilgrim, no matter how life-threatening the situation appears. While an ironic comparison, the Cinderella allusion highlights Billy Pilgrim's unlikely fate in an amusing way.

Unlock with LitCharts A+