The Federalist Papers

The Federalist Papers

by

Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay

The Federalist Papers: Federalist No. 70 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Alexander Hamilton argues that a strong, unified executive is essential for effective governance. He rejects the idea of a plural executive, where power is shared among multiple individuals, explaining that such a system would lead to confusion, conflicting decisions, and a lack of accountability. A single executive, on the other hand, allows for decisive action and clear responsibility, ensuring that the president can respond quickly to crises. He also emphasizes that the presidency is not unchecked; the separation of powers and the ability to remove a corrupt or ineffective leader through impeachment provide safeguards against abuse. Hamilton insists that an energetic executive is not a threat to democracy—rather, it is a necessary component of a functional government, as weak leadership would make it difficult to enforce laws, protect the nation, and respond to emergencies.
Hamilton’s argument for a unitary executive hinges on the belief that effective governance requires clarity and decisiveness—qualities he argues are impossible under a plural executive. By framing energy in the executive as essential for national security, law enforcement, and crisis management, Hamilton makes a strategic pivot from the anti-Federalist fear of tyranny to a fear of governmental paralysis. His focus is not just on the risks of weak leadership but on the systemic dangers that indecision and diffusion of responsibility pose to the stability of the republic.
Themes
Quotes