Farmers need secure long-term property rights in order for land improvement to be worth their while. England achieved this by giving them some political power. Of course, this was something of a historical accident. In fact, many contemporary economists and historians trace England’s success in the Industrial Revolution, global trade, and colonization to the fact that Parliament distributed power based on wealth (as well as nobility). This was not democratic in any real sense of the word, but it was certainly more democratic than political arrangements elsewhere in Europe (and especially in France, which is Smith’s favorite point of comparison). Put differently, the key link in England’s shift from feudalism to a commercial society was its political system. This once again shows that, while economists today often contrast “free markets” with ones regulated by the government, this distinction made no sense for Smith. Rather, he sought to show how markets could only be free if a favorable political system regulated them into existence.