Being Mortal

by

Atul Gawande

Being Mortal: Chapter 5 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
In 1991, a man named Bill Thomas begins a job as medical director of Chase Memorial Nursing Home in New Berlin, New York. Until then Thomas worked as an emergency physician at a nearby hospital, and he took the job as a chance to do something different. With fresh eyes, Thomas sees how depressing the nursing home is. At first, he tries to find a doctor’s solution, examining the residents and investigating their medications to bolster their spirits.
Thomas’s first approach reinforces doctors’ initial impulses to use medicine to fix everything. He doesn’t yet realize that, in reality, he needs to give people greater purpose and meaning in their lives outside of simply keeping them alive and safe.
Themes
Medicine, Survival, and Well-being Theme Icon
Soon, Thomas realizes that he needs to try something totally different. He knows the value of an independent and self-sufficient life. He wants to put more life into the home by adding plants, animals, and children to the residents’ lives. He lays out a plan to apply for a small New York State grant for innovations. He wants to attack the “Three Plagues of nursing home” life: boredom, loneliness, and helplessness. He suggests two dogs, four cats, and 100 birds. They win the grant and all the regulatory waivers needed to follow through on it.
By bringing in a garden, plants, animals, and children, Thomas hopes to give a greater degree of meaning and freedom to the people within the nursing home. Referencing the three plagues shows how necessary it is to combat the most crucial problems in the nursing home. Ironically, none of these “plagues” are health- or safety-related. Instead, the biggest problems have to do with well-being.
Themes
Medicine, Survival, and Well-being Theme Icon
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Thomas and others bring in the animals and the garden, and staff members bring in their children. Seeing the animals, the residents offer to help care for them. They establish feeding shifts for the animals and walking schedules for the dogs. The residents’ engagement with the animals not only makes them happier, but it also helps the staff monitor their sharpness as residents give daily reports on the animals.
Thomas’s plan shows that bringing in plants and animals is crucial for the residents’ well-being. Even though it makes the place a little more chaotic, it brings energy and purpose back into their lives, illustrating that there are more important things in life than safety. Implementing these changes even helps the staff watch over the residents, benefitting everyone.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Researchers study the effects of this experiment over two years and find that the number of prescriptions required per resident fell to half of that of a control nursing home—particularly drugs for agitation. Thomas posits that this is because of the fundamental human need for a reason to live. Even something as small as a plant to take care of makes people more active and alert.
As Thomas’s statement implies, safety is not a reason to live—it is a means, but not an end. People need something in addition to safety, and the animals provide that purpose and even give the residents a little more independence and control.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Get the entire Being Mortal LitChart as a printable PDF.
Being Mortal PDF
Thomas recalls meeting a man named Mr. L., who was admitted to the nursing home after a suspected suicide attempt. He gave up walking and refused to eat. But when he accepted a pair of parakeets, he started to perk up, giving him something to watch, companionship, and the chance to take care of something. He began eating, dressing, and getting out. He took the dog for a walk. Three months later, he moved out and back to his home—Thomas is convinced the program saved his life.
Thomas even shows how something as simple as an animal can give people a reason to live. In the case of Mr. L., he regained so much control over his own life that he even felt independent enough to leave the nursing home, providing him with even more autonomy. This shows how empowering these kinds of changes can be in nursing homes.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Quotes
In 1908, Harvard philosopher Josiah Royce wrote a book questioning why being merely housed and fed and safe and alive seems empty and meaningless. He concluded that we all seek a cause (big or small) beyond ourselves: family, country, a building project, or the care of a pet. Royce calls this “loyalty,” the opposite of “individualism.” The individualist puts his own interest first, and loyalty to something other than themselves seems strange. But he argues that human beings need loyalty, because our own desires are fleeting and often difficult to fully satisfy.
Royce’s philosophy illustrates why nursing homes are often so unsatisfying. Prioritizing safety does not provide people with meaning because it is entirely self-focused and there’s no purpose in it besides remaining alive, in line with Royce’s theory of individualism. Having loyalty means giving people the control to pursue something outside themselves.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Gawande supports Royce’s philosophy, noting that people care deeply what happens to the world after they die. As people’s time winds down, they become less ambitious but more concerned about legacy and the need to identify purposes outside themselves that make living meaningful. The problem with medicine and its institutions is that they have no view about what makes life significant. They concentrate on health and safety, but not “sustenance of the soul.” And yet these institutions define people’s last days. Both Bill Thomas and Keren Wilson wanted to help people in a state of dependence pursue meaningful existence.
Gawande uses Royce’s philosophy to illustrate medicine’s shortcomings. While medical institutions focus on health and safety, “sustenance of the soul” is just as—if not more—important. This requires people to have both purpose and enough autonomy over their lives to be able to pursue that purpose. Both Thomas and Wilson recognize this need and try to restore that autonomy and purpose in the elderly’s lives.
Themes
Medicine, Survival, and Well-being Theme Icon
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Quotes
Gawande explores other places that have tried to change the model, like NewBridge, a residence in the Boston suburbs. It is built not with shared apartments along endless corridors, but as houses for sixteen people, with private rooms built around common living areas. Research has found that units with fewer than 20 people have less anxiety and depression, more socializing and friendship, greater safety, and more interaction with staff. And it avoids the feel of a clinical setting, helping people bond and join in each other’s activities.
NewBridge also attempts to restore greater autonomy to people by making them feel like they live in a home with friends, rather than making them feel as though they live in a hospital. Through this home structure, they have a greater purpose, and as Gawande notes, better overall health and safety as a result.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
One day, Gawande interviews one NewBridge resident, Rhoda Makover. At 99, she has frequent falls and is nearly blind from retinal degeneration. But the staff understands how important walking is to her health and her mental well-being, so they allow her to continue. A few years earlier she lived alone and was happy. But then when she started falling, she moved into a nursing home. She was there for a year before moving to NewBridge and said there was no comparison. NewBridge also shares its grounds with a private school for kindergarten through eighth grade, and residents can work as tutors and librarians.
Rhoda’s experience at NewBridge echoes Gawande’s thoughts on what makes the place so meaningful, because it provides people with a variety of outlets to live for something outside themselves. NewBridge gives them the ability to have control over their lives and engage with the world outside of the nursing home.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Another place, Peter Sanborn Place, was built in 1983 and had 73 units for independent, low-income elderly people. As residents aged, Jacquie Carson, the director, knew she needed more accommodations for them. She brought in physical therapists and organized nurses. But officially, it’s still just a low-income housing unit. Carson often battles the medical system, working with ambulance services and hospitals so that the place is consulted about care for residents. But to her, it’s most important to help the residents stay in their homes.
Jacquie’s difficulty facing medical institutions despite her accommodations for the people in her units demonstrates the constant conflict for anyone who is not conforming to the standard nursing home structure. But Gawande commends those who are trying to reform end-of-life care to cater more to the people who live in the residences.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
The Evolution of End-of-Life Care Theme Icon
Making lives meaningful in old age is new, and there aren’t any standard solutions yet. Gawande interviews Ruth Beckett, a Sanborn resident. She explained that her son Wayne has cerebral palsy; he can handle basic aspects of life, but he needs structure and supervision. When Sanborn opened, he became his first resident. Three decades later, when a fall put Ruth in a nursing home, Carson worked out how to take Ruth in so she could be with her son. Jacquie hopes to build more units, but she faces lack of funding and bureaucracy.
Ruth’s case shows just how important these kinds of reforms can be. Without Sanborn Place, Ruth would never be able to see her son Wayne. But by taking her needs into account, Sanborn Place helps her regain control over her own life and help her take care of her son as well.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Gawande finds many places trying to change the traditional nursing home model. While these places often look extremely different from one another, the people in charge of them are committed to a single goal—maintaining people’s autonomy. There are different kinds of autonomy: one is living completely independently and free of limitation. But this is only a means to an end, as freedom is not a measure of worth in a person’s life. There is a second sense of autonomy: the freedom to be the author one’s own life. The battle of being mortal is the battle to maintain a connection to who you are or who you want to be. Professionals and institutions should not make this battle harder in the name of safety.
Gawande makes a crucial distinction about autonomy: he knows that his first definition, living independently, doesn’t make for a meaningful life, just as safety doesn’t make for a meaningful life. Instead, the more important definition of autonomy is having the freedom to choose how to live one’s life, even under certain kinds of limitations. And he explicitly states that this kind of autonomy is not worth risking simply for the purpose of safety.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
Lou is soon to go to a nursing home when Shelley hears about a new place opening: the Leonard Florence Center. Lou is impressed from the first tour, as all the rooms are single—something normally unheard of in nursing homes. It also looks like a home, rather than a hospital. This is in part thanks to Bill Thomas, who wanted to build a home for the elderly from the ground up—one that looked like a nursing home to the government, but which felt like a home to the residents. He called it a “Green House.” Not long afterward, a foundation he worked with launched the National Green House Replication Initiative, which constructed more than 150 Green Houses—including the Leonard Florence Center.
In contrast to their search for an assisted living facility, in which Shelley was impressed by the cleanliness and the activities available, here Lou focuses on his day-to-day quality of life and the things that will be most meaningful to him. Additionally, it shows the value of people like Bill Thomas, who are working to reform assisted living and nursing home facilities to return autonomy and purpose to the residents’ lives.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon
The Evolution of End-of-Life Care Theme Icon
All Green Houses are small and communal, with no more than 12 people. The residences are warm and homey, and the residents determine their own schedules. Residents like Lou work together with the caregivers, each of whom focuses on just a few residents. Each caregiver cooks, cleans, and most importantly, provides companionship. Lou connects with the other residents, but he also values his time alone. Sitting with Lou and talking in the Green House, Gawande thinks that this is the first time that he does not fear reaching this phase of life. While Lou’s mind and body are slowly deteriorating, he is still able to live in a way that makes him feel he has a place in the world.
The relationship between the residents and caregivers is a crucial one, and this is a big difference between what Lou experienced at the assisted living facility and even when living at Shelley’s. The center acknowledges that he needs help doing certain tasks safely, but it prioritizes his schedule and desires rather than the staff’s. And he is able to determine what he wants to do at all times, in all aspects of his life. This is also an important contrast with Alice Hobson, who did not have that control, and as a result, did not feel that she still had a place in the world, as Lou does.
Themes
Safety vs. Autonomy Theme Icon