Good to Great: Chapter 8  Summary & Analysis

Collins begins by introducing the symbol of the flywheel, a heavy metal disk that must be pushed slowly and steadily, over and over, before it eventually builds up the momentum to race forward under the force of its own weight. Though the results are remarkable, it’s impossible to say which small push was the one that caused the momentum; rather, the combination of all the little actions is the key factor. Collins states that this process of “buildup and breakthrough” appears in the transformations of each of the good-to-great companies.

Even though the good-to-great transformations all occurred through the gradual effort of the flywheel model, serious media coverage of the companies’ success usually did not begin until the flywheel was already moving fast. Collins notes that public perception of companies’ transitions to greatness is skewed accordingly; these changes seem dramatic and fast from the outside, when actually they occur through gradual, mundane effort. For example, Circuit City was described in the media as an overnight success, when it fact its transition had been underway for over a decade.

Collins describes how he and his team tried repeatedly to find “the one big thing” that defined good-to-great companies’ moments of breakthrough. However, their interviews always indicated that progress was incremental and cumulative, without a single moment or event that indicated breakthrough. Accordingly, good-to-great executives never had names, taglines, or launch events for their transformations. These changes simply happened through consistent effort, without fanfare. Even when the companies’ short-term circumstances were dire, they became great by focusing on the long-term picture and acting accordingly.

The slow buildup of momentum and the small, tangible results that it creates often lead to what Collins calls “the flywheel effect.” Feeling the increasing momentum leads to excitement and enthusiasm from both internal employees and outside investors. With the flywheel in motion and the right people in place, motivation and commitment occur naturally, without being forced by management. Instead of setting grand goals, the good-to-great companies created enthusiasm using the steady gains of the flywheel.

In contrast, Collins and his team found a pattern at the comparison companies that they term the doom loop. These companies often tried to use new programs to motivate employees and jump straight to the breakthrough phase, only to change course when the breakthrough didn’t occur. This lack of consistency prevented these companies from building up the slow momentum that the flywheel requires. At the same time, they frequently brought on new leaders or acquisitions that usually hindered momentum rather than increasing it. Collins notes that a major contrast between the two sets of companies is that good-to-great companies made acquisitions after defining Hedgehog Concepts and creating momentum with the flywheel, while comparison companies tried (unsuccessfully) to use acquisitions to create momentum.

Collins zooms out on the idea of the flywheel to suggest that this model brings together the two key concepts of consistency and coherence. The flywheel shows that each of the good-to-great characteristics that Collins identifies throughout the book must work together in a coherent whole, wherein the total is more than the sum of the parts. Through consistently applying each of the components in concert with each other, momentum builds and change occurs. Collins argues that by bringing together consistency and coherence with discipline over time, breakthrough can and will occur for any company or organization.