Louise’s comments convincingly suggest Rachel’s malice. It seems possible that Rachel would refrain from marrying Philip in order to retain the estate and a degree of financial independence. However, what none of the characters (including Louise) consider is that all Rachel may actually be guilty of is not loving Philip. After all, Rachel has never asked Philip to give her more, and aside from overdrafting her account once, it does not seem that she has stolen anything. Yet again, du Maurier plays the delicate balancing game of hinting at Rachel’s guilt, only to also provide evidence of her innocence.