Isolation Theme Analysis

One of the primary ways characters in Noli Me Tangere are disempowered is through isolation: political isolation, religious isolation, or intellectual isolation. Politically, all of the characters are isolated from Spain, the governing body that controls the Philippines. While the friars take advantage of this remoteness, the townspeople suffer. Religiously, any character who disagrees with Catholic doctrine is isolated and labeled a heretic. This religious seclusion is often related to intellectual isolation, which characters like Tasio experience when they openly voice an affinity for alternative ideas, such as those promoted by philosophy or logical reasoning. For Tasio, intellectual isolation almost seems liberating, since he embraces his status as a supposed “madman” and is therefore free to think whatever he wants. However, Rizal ultimately implies that estrangement and the loss of community most often lead to disenfranchisement and woe.

The most obvious form of isolation in the novel has to do with colonialism. First and foremost, this type of isolation is a geographic reality, since the Philippines is an island chain in Southeast Asia, while Spain—its colonial overlord—is in Europe. The fact that Spain colonized and controls the Philippines means that the friars and government officials who travel from Madrid and other Spanish cities are significantly removed from what they refer to as the “homeland.” Unfortunately, as Tasio points out, this means that the Spaniards in the Philippines have an inordinate amount of control. Since their government is so remote, they can manipulate with impunity rules and policies passed down from Spain. This confirms the notion that geographic isolation easily turns into a form of political isolation that benefits the friars. Furthermore, as Tasio points out, the friars find a way to use their political isolation to their advantage even when somebody influential bothers to make a trip to the Philippines from Spain. On these rare occasions, the friars tell the Spanish visitor that, because he is so unfamiliar with the Philippines, it would be best to trust the priests who have power over the population. Therefore, the region’s top authorities are able to use their own remoteness to their advantage as a way of holding onto their influence.

Another type of isolation that disempowers the Filipino characters of Noli Me Tangere is religious isolation. The threat of excommunication hangs heavily over the town, since banishment from the church leads to social and even economic estrangement. Furthermore, despite the fact that the friars are supposedly in the Philippines to spread religion, they often keep the townspeople from fully integrating into Spain’s Catholic tradition. Harold Augenbraum makes this clear in his introduction to Noli Me Tangere when he notes that “in 1817, only 171 of the 782 parishes in the Philippines were led by native or mestizo priests.” This exclusion of Filipinos is in keeping with Father Dámaso’s insistence that the schoolmaster not speak in or teach Spanish, instead telling him to use Tagalog, the country’s native language. Whereas the friars are able to use their geographic isolation to their advantage, they keep the townspeople from integrating into Spanish life, which leaves them without access to institutional power. In other words, the friars allow the citizens to participate in the church, but only insofar as the church benefits monetarily from the community involvement. Consequently, friars isolate Filipinos in their own country as a way of ensuring the strength and power of the church.

As an intellectual who believes in reason rather than religion, Tasio experiences intellectual isolation, since everybody calls him a “madman” due to his secular viewpoints. However, at the same time, he is perhaps the novel’s only character who seems to feel liberated by isolation. This is because he sees his own estrangement as license to live unencumbered by outside perceptions. He takes comfort in the fact that the people he disagrees with think he’s crazy; “the day on which they restore my reason is the day they deprive me of the small bit of freedom I’ve purchased at the price of a reputation as a sane person,” he tells Ibarra, meaning that he feels somewhat liberated as a result of being ostracized for his ideas. “I neither think nor live according to their laws,” he says. “My principles, my ideals, are different.” It’s worth noting that the difference between Tasio’s isolation and the other townspeople’s isolation is that his is willful. He is intellectually isolated because he chooses not to partake in the society’s customs. As a result, he exercises his own personal agency within an otherwise oppressive context. And instead of lamenting that his ideas have estranged him from his own culture, he celebrates his ability to disagree with the church.

While Tasio’s intellectual isolation may seem liberating, Rizal tacitly condemns embracing this kind of private existence. This is made clear when Tasio dies alone, having perished “on the very threshold of his solitary refuge.” The phrase “solitary refuge” emphasizes the old man’s isolation, and because the sentence containing these words tells readers of Tasio’s death, Rizal subtly implies a connection between his sad demise and his “solitary” ways. If Ibarra and Elías each represent two ways of dealing with oppression (working to improve the system from within or striving to overthrow the system completely), Tasio represents a third: a retreat into the intellect. This, Rizal suggests, is a futile and defeatist way to deal with the country’s problems. A more effective way of addressing oppression, then, is to establish strong communities capable of collective political action. Although the characters in Noli Me Tangere never accomplish this, they come close to doing so when they build the school, which is a project that brings together the town’s secular minds and even gains support from high-ranking likeminded government officials like the Captain General. Furthermore, if Ibarra had more people like Elías on his side—people looking out for him and trying to protect him from the friars’ evil schemes—it is quite possible he and his group of forward-thinking citizens would have been able to effect meaningful change.