Rising Out of Hatred

by

Eli Saslow

Rising Out of Hatred: Chapter 4 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Matthew Stevenson has hosted Shabbat ever since his first few months on campus. He was the only Orthodox Jew at the school, and he got together with another Jewish student named Moshe to have dinner together. Gradually, the Shabbat dinner became a social circle all its own, including Christians, atheists, and students of color. They had recently been spending a lot of time talking about Derek after he was outed on the forum.
The students’ Shabbat dinner is another example of how communities are built on shared values—not only Jewish religious beliefs, but the desire to maintain cultural traditions and form meaningful relationships. Matthew at first builds a two-person community with Moshe before expanding it to include many other students from a diverse array of backgrounds.
Themes
Family, Community, and Values Theme Icon
Matthew had visited the Stormfront website years before, hoping to better understand anti-Semitic prejudice. Because he wore a yarmulke regularly, he was often harassed on the street. When he discovered Derek’s posts, he wrote to Moshe about how horrifying the hate speech was. But he reflected on his own faith and wondered if he could transform Derek’s thinking—after all, Matthew had undergone his own radical transformation.
Matthew recognizes, in reading Derek’s posts on Stormfront, that white nationalism isn’t harmless in the way that Derek might want people to believe. In reality, Derek’s writing has a massive impact on people—particularly the people his prejudice targets, who feel demonized and belittled for their beliefs or identities.
Themes
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Rhetoric and Language Theme Icon
Matthew was baptized Presbyterian; he came from a family of Protestants with ancestors in Scotland and Ireland. When he was young, his mother had gone into treatment for alcoholism, and he started feeling acute physical pain that no doctor could figure out. They treated him with drugs before insisting that his problem was likely psychological. He started to explore different spiritual treatments, and he and his father Michael enrolled in classes at the Kabbalah center, a Jewish tradition popularized as a method of self-improvement. Matthew’s pain began to ebb, and he grew more interested in Kabbalah and Judaism.
Matthew’s background provides an example of how people can undergo radical transformations in their thinking, as he alludes to in the previous passage. Matthew was simply exposed to Kabbalah practices, and because they helped him psychologically, he gradually became more interested in and open to Judaism. This suggests that transformation in behavior and thinking cannot come out of one conversation; instead, it takes a series of dialogues and a willingness to want to change.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Matthew gradually converted to Judaism, wearing a yarmulke, eating kosher, and teaching himself Hebrew. When he got into New College, he worried about putting distance between himself and the Kabbalah Centre. But his father and rabbis encouraged him to go; the purpose of Kabbalah is to put his faith to practical use. They told him to set an example on campus by respecting human dignity and always seeking out the best in himself and others. And so, Matthew does so by inviting Derek over—and Derek accepts his invitation to dinner that Friday.
In his own values, Matthew recognizes the importance of treating all people with respect, even someone who does not fundamentally treat him the same way. Being able to do so is key to fostering open dialogue, in contrast to James’s strategy, which is to ostracize Derek and make him feel lesser because of his beliefs. Matthew understands that only by genuinely engaging and extending friendship can Derek, in turn, come to recognize Matthew and other students as equals.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Get the entire Rising Out of Hatred LitChart as a printable PDF.
Rising Out of Hatred PDF
That Shabbat, only Matthew, Moshe, and Derek’s friend Juan are there. They want to ask him about his views, particularly on racial purity (as Juan is part European, part indigenous, and part Black) and the Holocaust (as Moshe’s grandfather narrowly survived the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp). They don’t feel uncomfortable talking to Derek in private like this, since there is less risk that classmates will accuse them of sympathizing with Derek or condoning his behavior. Several of their friends decide not to attend the dinner at the last minute. Matthew is angered by their small-mindedness, believing exclusion only reinforced divides. Matthew understood this acutely, as he is a political conservative among a largely liberal population on campus.
Again, Matthew emphasizes that in order to get through to Derek and change some of his thinking, they must first understand that thinking. It’s rare that Derek has to justify his beliefs to the people whom he is directly targeting, and so confronting his impersonal view of the “enemy” with students who are inviting him into their home is a new experience. And ostracizing him, as Matthew points out, will only push Derek further into white nationalism—therefore, reaching out is the only way to truly get through to him.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Matthew knows there is very little he can say to Derek to change his mind after growing up inside the white nationalist movement. So instead, Matthew simply wants to build a relationship that could teach him about Jewish people and people of color. At the dinner, they talk little about Derek or his background, instead talking about history. At the end, they have mutual respect, and Derek agrees to come back, feeling very lonely after months of isolation. There seems to be an implicit agreement: they will pretend to be oblivious about his white nationalist convictions, and Derek will keep his beliefs to himself. He decides that maybe every minority didn’t need to be his enemy, and the next day, Matthew tells Moshe that he thinks they made progress.
Ostracism provided a starting point for Derek, as it made him feel so isolated as to want to reconnect with people like Matthew and Juan, forcing him to socialize with the very people his white nationalist beliefs target. At the same time, this strategy only works when it is followed by open dialogue and friendship like the kind that Matthew and Derek are able to build, because it allows Derek to recognize people that he normally thinks of as the “enemy” are, in fact, kind, considerate people who might not actually be as threatening to him as he believes.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Quotes
In between dinners, Derek spends much of his time at his rental house and gets to know the landlord, Maynard Hiss, who knows nothing about Derek’s background. Maynard likes Derek’s earnestness, friendliness, and humility. He thinks that Derek is well-raised, but he does wonder why Derek seems so lonely. So, when Maynard is leaving one evening for a community contra dance (like square dancing), he invites Derek along, and Derek agrees to go. They later start kayaking together as well.
While the book doesn’t excuse Derek’s racist beliefs, it does show an alternate side to Derek. People like Maynard, who don’t know about Derek’s beliefs, see him as a genuine, friendly, and humble person. In this way, even people who hold hateful beliefs can have redeemable qualities.
Themes
Redemption Theme Icon
A few weeks later, however, Maynard learns about Derek’s background from another New College student, who warns that Derek might be dangerous. When Maynard confronts Derek, Derek admits that he is a white nationalist and that he still hosts his radio show. He apologizes to Maynard, who says he needs to consider things. But as Maynard tries to square the idea of a bigoted radical with the Derek he knows, he becomes convinced that Derek isn’t really hateful, as he so openly engages with people unlike him.
Maynard’s shock at finding out who Derek is—and his statement that he needs to consider whether to keep Derek as a tenant—emphasizes how offensive and threatening Derek’s beliefs are for outsiders to the white nationalist movement. However, Maynard’s thoughts also reflect the idea that Derek has already begun to shift his thinking simply by being exposed to new people and perspectives, and that he is capable of growth and redemption.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
Later that fall, Derek signs up for the New College talent show after making a tentative reentry into social life on campus. He walks onstage to a smattering of boos, but when he starts to play a folk song called “Adrian” by Mason Jennings, the crowd quiets—he is very good. Derek loves the song, which he thinks is about the Wild West and an unjust execution. He finishes to some applause and a second-place prize.
Derek’s song choice—and his interpretation of it—illustrate how much his values and ideology have shaped his worldview. The book hints at the idea that Derek’s interpretation might be a skewed one that aligns with his white nationalist beliefs in thinking of himself as a persecuted individualist and revolutionary.
Themes
Family, Community, and Values Theme Icon
The next day, however, some classmates send Derek a note. The song, “Adrian,” was inspired by Toni Morrison’s Beloved, a book about the psychological effects of slavery. The song is about a lynching, and Mason Jennings sang it at civil rights rallies. They thought Derek was “trolling” them, and he writes back explaining himself. To him, the song is the story of a person who’s condemned unjustly and made an example of by a crowd; he views it as a song about himself.
The true meaning behind the song, which references Toni Morrison’s classic Beloved, could not be further from Derek’s interpretation. While the other students assume that Derek is trying to make fun of them, Derek’s explanation makes it clear that he didn’t choose the song maliciously. This suggests that many of his beliefs come from ignorance—not knowing the full picture of a given situation or realizing how it affects others. 
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
One student, Bárbara Suárez, replies, telling Derek that he endorses cruelty and inhumanity; he is not a victim of it. Derek replies that he doesn’t want to ignore human suffering, and she responds that he ignores anything that might point to his privilege. In addition, he dodges his real stance on race.
Bárbara points out that Derek’s beliefs are truly harming people, and that he is unwilling to acknowledge that harm. This hints at how a key part of Derek’s transformation going forward will require acknowledgement of the mistakes that he has made and attempts to rectify that damage.
Themes
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
Derek is starting to hear other people’s views, which are very different from his own. He enrolls in a German poetry class and listens to Jewish poems about the Holocaust. A Haitian immigrant stops him on campus and tells him about the impact of stop and frisk. Another student emails him asking why the U.S. shouldn’t belong to Native Americans, the original majority. After hearing so many perspectives, Derek begins to question his assumptions. But he sticks to his talking points about white privilege and race, and other students begin to feel they are talking to a robot.
Stop and frisk was a decades-long policy in New York City whereby a police officer could stop and search any person they deemed suspicious. This policy led to discrimination against people of color, who were stopped and searched at much higher rates than white people. Derek’s exposure to these different lived experiences and arguments helps him shift his own perspective—he questions his assumptions even though he’s not yet ready to outwardly concede in arguments.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
That winter, students want to protest what they feel are increasingly hostile aggressions and micro-aggressions on campus, even beyond Derek. Students are hanging Confederate flags and writing slurs on posters in the café. The student activists decide to try and close the school for a day and force their classmates to listen to their concerns on racism. Five students speak at a staff meeting, asking permission for this shutdown and to hold events about prejudice and discrimination. Ultimately, they convince the faculty to agree, and the students arrange for someone from the SPLC to lead the event.
As the students at New College discuss the racism and oppression that they experience on campus, it becomes clear that white supremacy takes on many forms. It’s not just found in overt violence or discriminatory policies, but in words and symbols that can make students feel unwelcome or unsafe on campus.
Themes
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Derek grows nervous hearing the SPLC is involved, as the SPLC has long kept an extremist file on his family. Don often called the SPLC “vile predators” and “Jewish supremacists.” Derek complains to the student organization that the SPLC uses personal attacks to defame people, but few people care about his complaints. At one of the events on the lawn, the SPLC reads anonymous statements from students, talking about transphobic comments and examples of racism on campus. One comment says that they left a class because Derek was in it and they didn’t feel safe, and the student asks why Derek’s free speech is more important than their education.
This passage emphasizes how Derek’s presence on campus and the statements that he has made in the past have overtly harmed people—even preventing them from getting the kind of education they want. Derek’s complaint about the SPLC defaming people is ironic given the fact that Don calls them “vile predators” and “Jewish supremacists,” using hate speech himself to attack the SPLC.
Themes
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Seeing his professors, Matthew, and Moshe gathered to listen to the speakers from the SPLC, Derek wonders how so many smart people could all be wrong. He hears non-white speakers talk about how racism makes them feel unsafe and diminishes their self-worth, and he considers that there might be truth in what they are saying. At the same time, activists on campus wonder whether Derek might actually be listening to their message.
Being ostracized by so many people has provided a starting point for Derek to understand that his actions and words are tangibly harmful to people. But ostracism is only part of what begins Derek’s transformation. Now, Derek has to be willing to have open dialogue with people—or to at least listen to others’ perspectives—in order to then reform his own thinking, and he begins to do so here. But at this point, he doesn’t open himself up fully to other students, so they’re unsure if he’s really listening to what they have to say.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Quotes
A few days later, Matthew hosts a birthday party for Derek. Real friendships have returned to his life—Derek has even hosted Matthew at his home, making sure all his ingredients were kosher. Derek has continued to attend Shabbat dinner, and many of Matthew’s friends returned. After the dinners, Derek stays with Matthew (who can’t work, drive, write, or use his phone on Shabbat), and they talk and play games together.
Derek’s friendship with Matthew shows that his beliefs about Jewish people have shifted at least when dealing with people interpersonally. Derek respects Matthew and takes care to respect his religious beliefs as well, showing how open dialogue between the two friends has begun to change Derek’s attitudes.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Some people start to worry about Matthew getting so close to a white nationalist; they wonder if Derek might be using Matthew. Matthew knows that people naturally divide themselves, but he doesn’t want to do that; he wants to treat Derek with respect. Other students quote Derek’s latest anti-Semitic radio talking points to Matthew. Still, Matthew is resolute—he thinks Derek is already softening.
The fact that Derek still hosts a white nationalist radio show and denigrates Jewish people suggests that he still has a long way to go in completely reforming his behavior—and this passage shows how his words hurt Matthew. Nevertheless, the genuine friendship between them suggests that Derek’s views may continue to change if the two men remain friends and continue to have productive conversations.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon