Poverty, Crime, and Violence Theme Analysis

Lazarillo de Tormes was a unique book at the time of its publication because it portrayed the world realistically through the eyes of a poor boy rather than a nobleman or a more conventional hero. The book’s frank depiction of how crime and violence are interwoven into the fabric of the lives of poor people was shocking to the Spanish readership of the 16th century. Ultimately, the author represents the crimes committed by the poor as victimless crimes, committed out of necessity, while the conditions in which poor people live and the punishments they are served for their crimes are treated by the author as the more reprehensible violence, inflicted by those in power against those without.

All around Lazaro, the poor and low-born are subject to violence, either by being forced into danger in service of the rich, or by the rich punishing them directly. Lazaro himself is frequently subjected to brutal violence at the hands of the masters he serves, often with no real recourse but to continue serving them until an opportunity for escape presents itself. He moves from one master to the next, hoping that the pain he has to endure will be less. Despite all this, extreme hunger is perhaps the greatest source of suffering for Lazaro. The pain of hunger seems to be deliberately inflicted on Lazaro by his masters, making it the violence that characterizes his life story more than any other.

In many instances Lazaro retaliates with violence or theft against the masters that abuse him, but these acts of violence are presented as justified. For example, Lazaro steals systematically from the blind man because the blind man deprives Lazaro of a fair share of the spoils that Lazaro helps to bring in. Lazaro injures the blind man on several occasions—finally perhaps mortally—but he feels no remorse. Lazaro also steals from the priest’s chest of bread, feeling he has no choice if he hopes to survive, since the priest starves him.

Over the course of the text, distinctions become blurred between cruel and arbitrary violence against the weak, violence as punishment for crime, and retaliatory violence. But by regularly treating the crimes of the powerless against those in power as justified, the author portrays poverty itself as a violence inflicted by those in power against those without. As a vivid depiction of class inequality, the book seems to encourage—sometimes explicitly—a total upheaval of the social order by means of violent rebellion.