One challenge that the Congo reform movement faced was that it had “bet the farm” on Leopold II—it had positioned Leopold at the center of the international controversy. Thus, when Leopold died, people concluded that Belgian tyranny was dead, too. While the Belgian Parliament introduced
some reforms in the Congo in the years following Leopold’s death, the Congolese continued to live under foreign domination, be treated as subhuman, and face punishment for petty or nonexistent crimes. Morel’s Congo reform movement could be considered a great success or a great failure. On one hand, he succeeded in drawing international attention to the Congo atrocities; on the other hand, the “solutions” to the problem that emerged from the controversy were limited and, in many ways, superficial. Morel may have succeeded in banning specific cruel practices in the Congo, but (partly because of the strength of the British Empire, and partly because of his own political biases) he didn’t really attack the root cause of the problem—imperialism itself.