LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Mother to Mother, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Legacy of Colonialism and Apartheid
Family, Tradition, and Obligation
Language, Storytelling, and History
Summary
Analysis
Mandisa explains that there is some knowledge she’s had with her for her entire life. She was either born with it, or learned it very young. Her parents often complained about their white bosses, and often drove home the idea that “white people stole our land.”
In this chapter, Mandisa begins to examine how language connects people to a shared history in the context of colonialism and oppression. From a young age, Mandisa learns from her parents’ complaints and rants that white people are the oppressor, and that she is part of a wider body of oppressed people.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Mandisa learned the history of this phrase when Tatomkhulu, her grandfather, came to visit. After hearing what she’d been learning at school, he decided to help reeducate her. First, he explains the origins of the names Cape of Storm and Cape of Good Hope, which are both names for the Cape Town. Europeans named it Cape of Storms because the rough sea destroyed ships, but when they decided to settle there, the land became a hopeful place, hence the Cape of Good Hope.
Mandisa’s grandfather sees it as his duty to educate Mandisa about the current political climate under apartheid. However, instead of starting his story in 1948, at the beginning of apartheid, he reaches back three centuries, starting with colonialism. In doing so, Tatomkhulu points out colonialism’s legacy, suggesting that it is still present and pernicious three hundred years later.
Active
Themes
Another day, Tatomkhulu tells Mandisathe story of Nongqawuse. Mandisa learned in school that she was “a false prophet who told people to kill all their cattle” with the promise of new cattle; the people did as she said, “because they were superstitious and ignorant.” Upset, Tatomkhulu tells Mandisa the real story.
The schools for black South Africans are funded by the white government, and thus the government has control over what the children learn about their own histories. Mandisa’s misinterpretation of the story of Nongqawuse shows that the government dramatically altered the legend to further degrade black South Africans and make fun of their sacred narratives and culture.
Active
Themes
Tatomkhulu explains the people were not “superstitious and ignorant”; instead, they had a deep hatred for the white people who had invaded their homeland. “No sacrifice [was] too great, to wash away the curse” of the settlers, and since then people have only become more hateful.
Tatomkhulu prefaces his story with a connection between the oppression their ancestors felt under colonialism and the oppression they feel now under apartheid, which maintains the trappings of colonialism. He uses a story to connect Mandisa to a long-standing history of oppression that she shares with her ancestors.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Get the entire Mother to Mother LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Tatomkhulu continues, underscoring the love that the UmXhosa people had for their cattle, and how great their hatred would have to be to kill their livelihood. Cattle provide meat, milk, and fertilizer, and they also act as currency to be traded as dowries, or payments. However, resentment was so deep, in the 1850s people felt they had no other choice. People killed their cows and burned their fields, but three days later, when Nongqawuse promised a storm would come to replace their cattle and sweep the white settlers away, nothing happened. Instead, the UmXhosa people, now starving, were forced to work in white-owned mines and sell their lands to be able to eat.
The UmXhosa people snap under the pressure of colonialism and do something that may seem unwise to an outsider: destroy their only source of food and currency, leaving them even more vulnerable than before. In some ways, this mirrors Mxolisi’s murder of the Girl; like his ancestors, Mxolisi cracks under the pressure of a lifetime of violence and oppression and lashes out in desperation. Like the UmXhosa people killing their livestock, Mxolisi’s killing of the Girl only makes him more vulnerable in the face of a harsh government.
Active
Themes
Tatomkhulu explains that songs like “Hayi, ilishwa!Amabhulu, azizinja!One settler, one bullet! By the match stick, we shall free our nation!” came later, but for centuries prophets like Nongqawuse have been calling for violent or divine ways to save their nation from white settlers. Through these stories, Tatomkhulu explains how, “what had seemed stupid decisions, and acts that had seemed indefensible became not only understandable but highly honorable.”
By rehashing Tatomkhulu’s story of the prophetess Nongqawuse, Mandisa implicitly argues that Mxolisi’s murder of the Girl is the bubbling up of three decades of oppression under the government’s racist apartheid regime and three centuries of oppression under colonialism and its legacy.
Active
Themes
Quotes
Back in the present, Mandisa wakes up in the afternoon from a long nap. Siziwe is already awake, and tells Mandisa that Mxolisi still hasn’t returned. She reports that boys came by in a car to talk to Lunga. This disturbs Mandisa, as no one in her family knows anyone with a car, and no one in her neighborhood owns a car. Siziwe overheard some of Lunga’s conversation with the boys, and tells her mother she thinks Mxolisi had something to do with the Girl who was murdered.
The detail about the car is another reminder of the family and community’s poverty under apartheid, in which black South Africans are disenfranchised and impoverished, forced to work long hours at low wages.
Active
Themes
Mandisa forces herself to eat with Siziwe, but is interrupted by the sound of a car outside—a surprising sound in Guguletu. A man exits and knocks on the door. Mandisa invites the man in, who introduces himself as Reverend Mananga. He tells her to pass on a message to Mxolisi, that he’s found a meeting place for him. However, as he speaks, he writes a note, which he hands to Mandisa as he leaves. It tells her to take a taxi to Khayelitsha, and get off at the last stop. Mandisa immediately prepares to go. She assumes the Reverend is leading her to her son.
In this passage, Reverend Mananga uses written language (knowing that spoken language may not be confidential) to connect Mandisa with her son again.
Active
Themes
Mandisa boards a taxi towards Khayelitsha. A woman sits next to her, and gives her a note, telling Mandisa to get off the taxi one stop after the woman. Mandisa follows this instruction. At the taxi stop, Reverend Mananga pulls up in his car, and tells her to wait for a woman driving a red car. This woman arrives, and invites Mandisa into her car. She drives Mandisa to a safe house, where a woman ushers her inside. Mandisa waits alone in a room for half an hour, until Mxolisi enters the room. They look at each other for a moment, and then begin to hug and cry.
Several people are involved in the process of guiding Mandisa toward her son, which ties in with the novel’s interest in family and community as sources of guidance and support. This passage is also important because readers finally meet Mxolisi in the novel’s present narrative, rather than in the context of Mandisa’s thoughts and memories.
Active
Themes
Mxolisi tells Mandisa he’s being blamed for the murder of the Girl. He insists he was “just one of a hundred people who threw stones at the car.” Mandisa questions him, as she knows the Girl died from knife wounds. Mxolisi retorts, “many people stabbed her.” Mandisa wants to know if her son stabbed the Girl; he refuses to answer at first, and then insists he didn’t, sobbing. Mandisa holds her son in his arms as he cries, eventually asking him again, why people are blaming him if he is not guilty.
In the real-life murder of Amy Biehl, which this novel is based on, four men were charged for her death. In Mother to Mother, it seems that other people were responsible for the Girl’s death, but that the responsibility ultimately rests on Mxolisi’s shoulders alone. In changing this detail, Magona streamlines the narrative but also puts all the weight of grief on one mother.
Active
Themes
Mxolisi continues to insist he was not the only one present at the Girl’s murder. Mandisa becomes increasingly upset, asking him if he understands that the Girl is dead forever. Mandisa is terrified for her son and for herself. She understands Mxolisi will be arrested and charged with murder. She calls Mxolisi a fool, explaining that his “knife has her blood, it doesn’t matter if you stabbed her in the thumb.”
The idea that a parent is fully responsible for their child reappears here. Mandisa explicitly notes that she is afraid for her own safety, which is a reminder that the wider community in Guguletu also believes parents must be held accountable for their children’s actions. Mandisa knows, then, that the community will punish her along with Mxolisi.
Active
Themes
Mandisa wonders, “who was consoling whom?” Both she and Mxolisi cry and comfort one other. Eventually, they pull apart, and Mandisa can see “pain and terror” in her son’s eyes.
Mandisa and Mxolisi are both grieving and comforting one another equally, which implies that Mandisa feels her son’s crime might as well be her own.