De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation
In The Color of Law, historian Richard Rothstein’s central argument is that, from the 1870s to the present day, federal, state, and local governments in the United States have systematically and intentionally segregated American cities. While most Americans assume that their country’s pervasive pattern of racial segregation is the de facto product of individual decisions and market conditions, Rothstein argues that this is incorrect: American residential segregation is de jure, a product…
read analysis of De Jure vs. De Facto SegregationSegregation and the Preservation of Racial Caste
While readers familiar with 20th-century American history will immediately understand the importance of integrating American cities, others might wonder why segregation is necessarily a bad thing. As Rothstein notes, some might even ask why he wants “to force [Americans] to integrate.” In response to this question, Rothstein explains that the systematic segregation of American cities sustained the American system of racial caste—by forcing African Americans to live in ghettos, the government ensured that…
read analysis of Segregation and the Preservation of Racial CasteRacism, Profit, and Political Gain
While it is easy to see how de jure (legally-mandated) residential segregation reflects an underlying, systemic racism in American government and society, this does not explain why any individual—a white congressperson, real estate agent, government regulator, homebuyer, or police officer—would defend and perpetuate racist policies. Though not everyone historically responsible for these policies has necessarily been motivated by personal racist beliefs, all of these people’s actions are undeniably racist, because they contribute to systematic…
read analysis of Racism, Profit, and Political GainSeparation of Powers, Legal Activism, and Minority Rights
In his Preface to The Color of Law, Richard Rothstein notes that the U.S. government only truly began addressing de jure (legally-mandated) segregation in 1968, with the Fair Housing Act, even though it had already been ostensibly illegal for more than a century, since the ratification of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (which require “equal protection” for all people by federal and state governments, respectively). Why did it take so long for the…
read analysis of Separation of Powers, Legal Activism, and Minority Rights