In Lessons in Chemistry, Elizabeth Zott is a chemist whose life and career are guided by the principles of science—rationality, evidence, and experimentation. Her approach to life is deeply empirical, relying on observable and provable facts, which often puts her at odds with the more faith-based aspects of society. Elizabeth's character represents the scientific perspective, emphasizing logic, reason, and the pursuit of knowledge. In contrast, various characters in Lessons in Chemistry embody the religious and traditional viewpoints prevalent in that era. These characters often clash with Elizabeth, demonstrating the societal tensions between science and religion. At the mild end of the spectrum, there are the people that make up the audience of Elizabeth’s show, most of whom are housewives. These people disagree with Elizabeth’s views but respect her enough to continue watching her. On the more extreme end, there are people like the religious extremist who brings a bomb to a taping of Supper at Six.
Although the novel does not dismiss the potentially positive moral considerations of religion altogether, it largely argues for the value of a scientific worldview over a religious one. Many of the religious figures in the novel are either corrupt (such as the deacon who ran Calvin’s boys’ home) or narrowminded (like the people who write to Elizabeth’s show). The only seemingly religious figure who the novel portrays sympathetically is Wakely, who eventually admits that he does not believe in God. Meanwhile, Elizabeth and Calvin’s atheistic views are presented as sound, rational, and without flaw. As such, the novel rather unambiguously argues for the value of science over religion.
Science vs. Religion ThemeTracker
Science vs. Religion Quotes in Lessons in Chemistry
Harriet thought it was wrong not to believe in God. It lacked humility. In her opinion, believing in God was required, like brushing teeth or wearing underwear. Certainly, all decent people believed in God—even indecent people, like her husband, believed in God. God is why they were still married and why their marriage was her burden to bear—because it was given to her by God. God was big on burdens, and He made sure everyone got one. Besides, if you didn’t believe in God, you also didn’t get to believe in heaven or hell, and she very much wanted to believe in hell because she very much wanted to believe that Mr. Sloane was going there.
He sighed inwardly. The problem with being a minister was how many times a day he had to lie. This was because people needed constant reassurance that things were okay or were going to be okay instead of the more obvious reality that things were bad and were only going to get worse. He’d been officiating a funeral just last week—one of his congregants had died of lung cancer—and his message to the family, all of whom also smoked like chimneys, was that the man had died, not because of his four-pack-a-day habit, but because God needed him. The family, each inhaling deeply, thanked him for his wisdom.
“You’re a scientist,” he said. “Your job is to question things—to search for answers. But sometimes—and I know this for a fact—there just aren’t any.