The Color of Law

The Color of Law

by

Richard Rothstein

A huge, publicly-funded suburb built by David Bohannon’s company in Richmond, California. Rollingwood was explicitly segregated by government policy: it was reserved for white people, both by FHA and VA loan requirements and by restrictive covenants in housing deeds. This contrasts with the substandard, crowded housing African Americans received in industrial areas during the same period.
Get the entire The Color of Law LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Color of Law PDF

Rollingwood Term Timeline in The Color of Law

The timeline below shows where the term Rollingwood appears in The Color of Law. The colored dots and icons indicate which themes are associated with that appearance.
Chapter 1: If San Francisco, Then Everywhere?
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Segregation and the Preservation of Racial Caste Theme Icon
...loans to improve their houses—the government took out huge loans to built a suburb called Rollingwood, where African American people were prohibited from living and every house had an extra bedroom... (full context)
Chapter 5: Private Agreements, Government Enforcement
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
...that prospective suburban developers write this into deeds before insuring their mortgages. This happened in Rollingwood, Levittown, and numerous other suburbs Rothstein has mentioned so far in his book, and the... (full context)
Chapter 8: Local Tactics
Segregation and the Preservation of Racial Caste Theme Icon
Racism, Profit, and Political Gain Theme Icon
...A major developer of these neighborhoods was a man named David Bohannon, who also built Rollingwood in Richmond. One of the neighborhoods where Stevenson was barred from moving was the enormous... (full context)
Chapter 9: State-Sanctioned Violence
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Racism, Profit, and Political Gain Theme Icon
...veteran Wilbur Gary wanted to buy a house in 1952. A white friend was leaving Rollingwood, and in the 1948 Shelley v. Kraemer case, the Supreme Court had already decided that... (full context)