The Road to Character

by

David Brooks

The Road to Character: Chapter 6: Dignity Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Black civil rights leader A. Philip Randolph was born in 1899 in Jacksonville, Florida. His father was a minister, butcher, and tailor, and his mother was a seamstress. The family was poor but respectable. In the face of degrading racism, their sophisticated conduct rose above their material poverty. Randolph was schooled by two white teachers who had come South to educate underprivileged Black children.
Randolph’s family rose above their material circumstances by focusing on their inner lives and their moral character. Randolph was also educated above his material circumstances; from an early age, he learned to care about inner virtue and education more than money and material things.
Themes
Inner Life, External Life, and Character  Theme Icon
Instead of being a product of his circumstances, Randolph transcended his circumstances with his moral conduct. Through his dignity, he elevated himself above the conditions around him. He spoke in a lyrical voice and had an antiquated vocabulary; he always practiced morality and self-mastery. Even when he became famous, he resisted self-exposure and the accumulation of money, believing that those things corrupt a person. His incorruptibility and dignity made him impossible to degrade and humiliate. He became a model for civil rights leaders.
Randolph’s story resembles the way Frankl fortified his inner self so as not to be degraded by the torture he received in the concentration camp. Similarly, Randolph developed an inner dignity that elevated him above the racism surrounding him. Both men controlled their responses to suffering, elevating themselves above it rather than letting themselves be degraded by it.
Themes
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
Randolph attacked the problems of organizing imperfect people into groups to enact change, and amassing power without becoming corrupted by it.  Throughout his civil rights activism, Randolph was suspicious of his own sinfulness. He knew that he himself could do wrong even while fighting for justice. He worked to reconcile passion with patience and authority with leniency. He was “public-spirited,” which does not just mean he rallied protests; rather, he limited his own passions and opinions so as to bring as many diverse people as possible together. He was politically radical while personally traditional.
Randolph was a moral realist because he knew that he had the potential to become corrupt even though he was on the right side of justice. His philosophy of activism resembles Eisenhower’s philosophy of power in that he feared unchecked power and advocated for moderation. Like Eisenhower, his main goal was to bring people together in agreement, and he did this by tempering his own views.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Randolph moved to Harlem in April 1911, a month after the Triangle Factory fire. He dabbled in theater and briefly went to City College, where he first read Karl Marx. He opposed U.S. involvement in World War I and Marcus Garvey’s “Back-to-Africa” idea, which proposed that Black people should leave racist conditions in the U.S. and return to Africa. By 1920, Randolph had started half a dozen labor unions.
Randolph wanted to make real change in the nation. He advocated for peace in opposing U.S. entry into World War II, but at the same time he opposed Garvey’s passive solution to racism. He set to work putting together labor unions, trying to integrate newly freed slaves into society.
Themes
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
Get the entire The Road to Character LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Road to Character PDF
Randolph helped unionize formerly enslaved people who’d been hired by a railway company because the company thought they’d be a docile labor force. The workers didn’t side with Randolph in his critique of capitalism, so he founded their union on the fight for dignity instead. During a time when one could lose their job for participating in a union, this was dangerous work. Slowly the union grew to 7,000 members. However, when the Great Depression hit, membership fell to 700, and Randolph himself fell into severe poverty.
Randolph wanted to support formerly enslaved people by helping them get what they envisioned for themselves, rather than by imposing his vision on them. This shows self-renunciation and the surrender to a cause more important than himself. He helped unionize formerly enslaved people, encouraging them to dignify themselves above mistreatment in the same way Frankl encouraged his fellow prisoners.
Themes
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
The Black community turned against Randolph’s union because they found it too aggressive. In 1933, Roosevelt was elected, and labor laws changed. However, white employers couldn’t accept that to make change, they would have to cooperate with Black workers. Finally, the work month was reduced from 400 to 240 hours. Randolph was now the most famous Black organizer in the U.S.
Randolph came to realize, through the black community’s complaints, that aggression wasn’t working as a strategy for change. He patiently stuck with the Black community, shaping his vision so as to agree with theirs. He slowly worked toward lasting changes, such as the reduction of the work week. 
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
In the 1940s, with the onset of World War II, the Black community was met with another injustice: labor companies building wartime infrastructure weren’t hiring Black people. In response, Randolph issued a protest march on the Washington Mall. This shocked Roosevelt, and he called Randolph into the White House. Roosevelt offered to call a few employers and tell them to hire Black people, but Randolph wanted more than this; he wanted an executive order mandating that Black people be hired. After a long stalemate, an executive order was finally issued banning discrimination in defense industries. 
Randolph refused to accept Roosevelt’s unofficial promise of change, instead persuading Roosevelt to make an actual law protecting the rights of Black people in the work place through an aggressive yet nonviolent tactic. He threatened the March on Washington, which forced Roosevelt to see that his own refusal to pass the bill would be an unjust act. Randolph therefore provoked justice out of someone reluctant to give it.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
After the war, Randolph fought for labor rights more broadly. He struggled to focus his energies on a single cause. The admiration he received for his moral integrity and charisma hindered the achievement of his goals. However, he contributed significantly to the civil rights model when, inspired by Mahatma Gandhi, he advocated for non-violent resistance. He founded the League of Non-Violent Civil Disobedience Against Military Segregation and suggested restaurant sit-ins and peaceful protests. This non-violent approach required discipline and self-renunciation.
Randolph went on to advocate for a nonviolent approach to activism. The nonviolent tactic required the same self-discipline that is required in character-building. In being nonviolent, Randolph understood that he himself contained vices and was liable to become corrupt. Therefore, he used nonviolence to discipline himself and to check his own vices of anger and arrogance. In this sense, nonviolence is a tactic that protects against one’s own corruption while also opposing outside corruption.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Randolph and Bayard Rustin influenced each other during this time. Rustin was born in West Chester, Pennsylvania and was raised by his grandparents. His grandmother taught him to be dignified and self-controlled. She ran a Bible Group which emphasized the Book of Exodus and the Jewish experience in understanding Black liberation. Rustin went to Wilberforce College, where he came out as gay. After college, he moved to New York, where people were more accepting of homosexuality.
Bayard Rustin had a similar upbringing to Randolph’s. Rustin was also taught to be dignified and to thereby hold himself above other people’s poor treatment of him. Rustin would go on to struggle more than Randolph did to suppress his own vices. This possibly came from the fact that Rustin, being both Black and gay, had an even harder time finding acceptance than Randolph did.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
In Harlem, Rustin volunteered to join Randolph’s March on Washington before it was cancelled. He joined the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR), a Christian pacifist organization. He chose pacifism as a way to achieve both social change and inner growth. Achieving inner virtue means suppressing one’s rage, so Rustin took up a non-violent approach in his activism. In his twenties, Rustin became well-known in civil rights and pacifist circles. Once, he sat in the white section of a bus and then remained passive while the police beat him for his misdemeanor.
Like Randolph, Rustin embraced the nonviolent approach to activism because he wanted to achieve inner growth as well as societal change. This required subjecting himself to horrible violence. He didn’t even resist or defend himself when police beat him for passively sitting in the white section of the bus. However, in remaining passive, he showed how cruel the police’s actions were by comparison.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
In 1943, Rustin was drafted. Instead of cooperating, he decided to go to jail. While in jail, he protested against racial segregation in the prison, sitting down in the white section of the cafeteria and stationing himself in the Whites Only section of the cell block. Whenever he was caught and beaten for this, he would maintain a calm pose of non-resistance.
Rustin religiously maintained his nonviolence by refusing to fight in World War II. Once in jail, he continued his protests and his stance of nonviolence. Rustin sacrificed his personal freedom and physical safety to participate in these protests.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
Although he was a hero, Rustin sometimes succumbed to rage, recklessness, and arrogance. He was promiscuous in his sexual life, pursuing partners with a disturbing doggedness. In jail, he performed sexual acts on other inmates. This behavior disappointed the civil rights community because it undermined his reputation as a disciplined leader. The leader of FOR admonished him, saying that promiscuity destroyed deep love. Rustin eventually admitted to his failures.
Despite his self-renunciation when it came to violence, Rustin could not control his sexual impulses or his arrogance. Although his behavior was arguably a response to the various forms of oppression he faced in his life, his uncontrolled behavior was actually damaging his cause because it diminished people’s trust in him.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
While on leave from jail, Rustin ran into a fellow activist, Helen Winnemore, who confessed her love for him. Although he refused her, Rustin was touched by her selfless love, regarding it as “a sign from God” that pointed him toward the light. He rekindled a relationship with a long-term lover, hoping this would protect him against looseness. When he was released from jail, he performed many nonviolent acts of protest. As his fame grew, however, his promiscuous tendencies reawakened. He was imprisoned again for a public sex act, and his reputation never recovered.
The gesture of unconditional love from Helen Winnemore started to get Rustin on the right track; it made him feel drawn toward God’s unconditional love. Rustin then tried to guard against his uncontrolled vices by committing to a relationship. However, he had still not achieved inner balance or control over his desires, and without that stable core, he couldn’t succeed in getting his life together.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Love, Transformation, and Service  Theme Icon
From this point on, Rustin stayed involved in the civil rights movement from the background. He mentored Martin Luther King, Jr., in his speeches and tactics. This raised suspicion in pastors and congressmen who threatened to disband King and Rustin’s friendship, believing that the two were having a sexual affair. Randolph was Rustin’s strongest ally. When Randolph admitted his disappointment that the March on Washington never took place, Rustin suggested they organize a “mass descent” on the capital.
After his second imprisonment, Rustin tried yet another approach. He decided to participate in the civil rights movement from the background, supporting others to be the face of the movement. In developing this mode of privacy, he was able to be of great use to Randolph and Dr. King, which resembles how Frances Perkins renounced her private life in order to serve Roosevelt.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
At first, civil rights organizations were skeptical about the march, not wanting to set themselves back by making those in power unwilling to help them. This attitude reveals that there were two civil rights movements: the first was mostly centered in the north among educated people. It proposed that society progressively becomes more knowledgeable and that, through appealing to reason, everyone will eventually see the injustice of racism. This camp was optimistic, believing that through conversation, everyone would come to see the goodness of human nature.
This camp of civil rights activists shares its assumptions about human nature with the moral romanticists. Both groups believe that human nature is inherently good. The moral romanticists believed that if human beings expressed their natural selves they would lead successful, happy lives. Similarly, these particular civil rights activists believed that humans weren’t fundamentally racist but only confused, and that through appealing to people’s true nature, justice would again conquer injustice.
Themes
Self-Renunciation vs. Self-Love Theme Icon
The other camp were “biblical realists”: they believed that humans are sinners by nature, and that in the world, the just often suffer while the unjust prosper. These people believe that the unjust will rationalize their injustice. They also believe that the just can become corrupt through trying to gain power, turning a selfless movement into fuel for their own vanity. The optimist group worships Man, believing that humans are naturally compassionate. The biblical realists worship God, believing that man is a natural sinner.
The biblical realists are very similar to the moral realists, as they both believe that human nature is inherently flawed and sinful. Therefore, the biblical realists did not try to appeal to people’s true nature. Instead, they believed that everyone was corrupt, and that the best way to fight for justice was to expose and confront injustice everywhere, even within themselves.
Themes
Self-Renunciation vs. Self-Love Theme Icon
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Randolph, King, and Rustin were biblical realists. They knew that those who defended segregation could not be convinced to do otherwise, and that civil rights activists themselves could not rely on their own goodwill for fear of perverting their cause into something self-serving. The only way forward was to surrender to the cause at the cost of their own happiness. As a result, biblical realists were more aggressive generally: they didn’t believe change could be made through education alone. Change could only come through relentless pressure.
An activist who is a biblical realist does not fight for the civil rights cause in order to attain their own happiness. Although they are against oppression, they must sacrifice their hopes for personal happiness in order to do this. Furthermore, the biblical realists did not believe in education as a tactic for change. As a result, they adopted aggressive, physical action and demonstration.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
That being said, the biblical realists were nonviolent, and their nonviolence coerced the unjust into performing blatant acts of injustice against their wills. In so doing, nonviolent protestors aggressively exposed the villainy of their enemies. Throughout their nonviolent protests, Rustin, King, and Randolph stood guard against their own corruptibility. They knew they were in danger of becoming arrogant and making poor moral choices as they gained more power. Rustin in particular, who’d struggled with personal vices, recognized nonviolence as a means for not only affecting social change but also one’s own discipline.
Although biblical realists had an aggressive approach in comparison to the gentle approach of appealing to people’s true nature, they were also defined by nonviolence. Through nonviolence, Rustin, Randolph, and King remained on the offense of the fight without corrupting themselves.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Brooks claims that the nonviolent approach is ironic: the weak succeed by suffering, the oppressed defeat the oppressor by not fighting back, and the just can be corrupted by their own justness. This ironic logic is the logic of those who see humans as a problem unto themselves, and human behavior as incomprehensible. It is important to fight injustice, but whatever power is gained in the process will corrupt even the just person. But if the strategy involves self-doubt, some victory is possible.
Nonviolence follows the same paradoxical logic that Adam II follows: in sacrificing oneself and confronting one’s flaws, a person builds character. Similarly, in repressing one’s rage and potential for vice by sticking to nonviolent protest, a protester magnifies the rightness of their cause; they keep their cause and the people fighting for it virtuous. Therefore, whatever they accomplish is a true moral victory.
Themes
Inner Life, External Life, and Character  Theme Icon
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Quotes
Rustin and Randolph rallied supporters for a real March on Washington. The violent protests in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963, in which police brutally set dogs on girls and hurled teenagers into walls, brought everyone over to Rustin and Randolph’s side. Randolph directed the march and Rustin served as deputy, organizing a Black police force to guard the marchers and resist clashes with non-violent tactics. A segregationist senator attempted to thwart the plans by railing against Rustin’s homosexuality, but this had the opposite effect of causing civil rights figures to support Rustin.
Rustin and Randolph’s moderate and nonviolent approach helped bring more people over to their side. Anyone who opposed them had to oppose them unjustly, because Randolph and Rustin weren’t doing anything that harmed other people. As more and more people became disgusted with racial violence—like police officers brutally suppressing innocent Black teenagers—more and more people backed Randolph and Rustin. This shows that nonviolence had the effect of unifying people against all expressions of violence.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
On the day of the March on Washington, Rustin and Randolph both spoke, and King delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. Randolph wept after the march when Rustin told him it looked like his dream had come true. Rustin spent the rest of his life fighting to end apartheid in South Africa and continuing to defend civil rights movements. He found personal peace in a long-term relationship with one man.
Randolph and Rustin were part of the March on Washington that went down in history. The march was the culmination of their tireless, patient efforts to combat injustice in the most moral way possible. Their feeling when the March was over was one of gratitude, showing that it was a truly moral achievement that arose from their patience and self-surrender.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Vocation and Sacrifice  Theme Icon
The story of Randolph and Rustin demonstrates how imperfect people exercise power in a corrupt world. They both held the worldview that human nature contains innate sin. In their different ways, they built inner structures to control their impulses. They knew that the only people who could change the world were those who aggressively fought for change while at the same time understanding that they are unworthy of doing so. This philosophy of power combines conviction with self-criticism.
Brooks suggests that Randolph and Rustin were able to change society because they believed they weren’t worthy of doing so. In upholding an attitude of self-doubt, they guarded themselves against sin and thereby increased the justness of the cause they were fighting for. If they had believed they were perfect, they would have succumbed to the same vices they were opposing in their enemies.
Themes
Vice, Virtue, and Self-Confrontation Theme Icon
Quotes