How Democracies Die

by

Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt

In politics, gatekeeping refers to political parties’ power to select certain candidates, which gives them the platform and legitimacy they need to succeed in elections.

Gatekeeping Quotes in How Democracies Die

The How Democracies Die quotes below are all either spoken by Gatekeeping or refer to Gatekeeping. For each quote, you can also see the other terms and themes related to it (each theme is indicated by its own dot and icon, like this one:
American Tyranny Theme Icon
).
Chapter 1 Quotes

Potential demagogues exist in all democracies, and occasionally, one or more of them strike a public chord. But in some democracies, political leaders heed the warning signs and take steps to ensure that authoritarians remain on the fringes, far from the centers of power. When faced with the rise of extremists or demagogues, they make a concerted effort to isolate and defeat them. Although mass responses to extremist appeals matter, what matters more is whether political elites, and especially parties, serve as filters. Put simply, political parties are democracy’s gatekeepers.

Related Characters: Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt (speaker)
Page Number: 20
Explanation and Analysis:
Chapter 2 Quotes

In short, Americans have long had an authoritarian streak. It was not unusual for figures such as Coughlin, Long, McCarthy, and Wallace to gain the support of a sizable minority—30 or even 40 percent—of the country. We often tell ourselves that America’s national political culture in some way immunizes us from such appeals, but this requires reading history with rose-colored glasses. The real protection against would-be authoritarians has not been Americans’ firm commitment to democracy but, rather, the gatekeepers—our political parties.

Related Characters: Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt (speaker), Father Charles Coughlin, Huey Long, Joseph McCarthy, Donald Trump, George Wallace
Page Number: 36-37
Explanation and Analysis:

Because they select our presidential candidates, parties have the ability—and, we would add, the responsibility—to keep dangerous figures out of the White House. They must, therefore, strike a balance between two roles: a democratic role, in which they choose the candidates that best represent the party’s voters; and what political scientist James Ceaser calls a “filtration” role, in which they screen out those who pose a threat to democracy or are otherwise unfit to hold office.
These dual imperatives—choosing a popular candidate and keeping out demagogues—may, at times, conflict with each other. […] There is no escape from this tension. There are always trade-offs.

Related Characters: Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt (speaker)
Page Number: 41
Explanation and Analysis:
Get the entire How Democracies Die LitChart as a printable PDF.
How Democracies Die PDF

Gatekeeping Term Timeline in How Democracies Die

The timeline below shows where the term Gatekeeping appears in How Democracies Die. The colored dots and icons indicate which themes are associated with that appearance.
Chapter 1: Fateful Alliances
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
...demagogues when political party elites “isolate and defeat them.” In fact, “political parties are democracy’s gatekeepers.” (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
Gatekeepers have successfully stopped extremists several times. In Belgium in 1936, two far-right parties challenged the... (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
There are also more recent examples of effective gatekeeping. In 2016, Austria’s traditional center-left and center-right parties faltered in the first round of the... (full context)
Chapter 2: Gatekeeping in America
American Tyranny Theme Icon
Authoritarianism vs. Democratic Norms Theme Icon
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Polarization and Inclusive Democracy Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
...been common for such figures to get 30-40% support in the U.S. Only political party gatekeepers have prevented them from winning power. (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
...a backroom deal. While such backroom dealing is anti-democratic, it’s also an example of good gatekeeping: risk-averse party leaders prevented “demonstrably unfit” candidates from getting nominated. Parliamentary systems also have gatekeeping... (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
The framers of the Constitution recognized the need for gatekeeping. They wanted the president to represent the popular will, but also didn’t trust the people,... (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
American political parties have generally relied too heavily on gatekeeping. Originally, congressmen chose the presidential candidates. Starting in the 1830s, the parties elected delegates from... (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Global and Historical Patterns Theme Icon
...George Wallace had 40% approval in 1968—the same level as Trump in 2016—but Democratic Party gatekeepers wouldn’t give him the nomination, so he had no chance of winning the presidency. In... (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Polarization and Inclusive Democracy Theme Icon
As a result of these changes, it’s become possible for candidates to win without party gatekeepers’ support. But still, few outsider candidates succeeded from the 1970s until the 2000s. To win... (full context)
Chapter 3: The Great Republican Abdication
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Polarization and Inclusive Democracy Theme Icon
...outsider candidates. Even after he started leading in the polls, media commentators assumed that party gatekeepers would keep him out of power. But gatekeepers were weaker than ever. After the Supreme... (full context)
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Levitsky and Ziblatt argue that Republican Party gatekeepers failed to do their job during the invisible primary, the state primaries, and the election. (full context)
American Tyranny Theme Icon
Extremism and Gatekeeping Theme Icon
Polarization and Inclusive Democracy Theme Icon
...competitors. Ultimately, in 2016, the invisible primary simply didn’t matter: Trump didn’t need the Republican gatekeepers. He was a celebrity, major conservative media figures supported him, and his endless controversies attracted... (full context)