Lafayette in the Somewhat United States

by

Sarah Vowell

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Lafayette in the Somewhat United States makes teaching easy.

Lafayette in the Somewhat United States: Pages 126-190 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
That folksiness was not enough to shield Franklin from the news that the Patriots were about to lose Philadelphia to the Redcoats. Though the city was not very important strategically to the Americans, it acted as a political hub, and it was therefore a crucial symbol of independence. Washington, Franklin, Lafayette and John Adams all worried that losing Philadelphia would destroy Patriot morale.
Just as symbolic victories were essential to American morale, symbolic losses were crushing—like when the Patriots had to surrender Philadelphia, the seat of American democracy and the place where the Declaration of Independence was signed.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Meanwhile, back home in France, Adrienne fretted that Lafayette had been killed in battle. When she learned it was only a leg wound (and one that was healing quickly), she was relieved. Better still, Lafayette’s wartime exploits were earning him applause among the very French nobles who had once discouraged his journey to America.
Lafayette was finally getting the glory he had dreamed of for so many years. But as reports of his wartime exploits reached France, he further upset his wife. Again, glory on the battlefield was getting in the way of Lafayette’s family obligations.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
As Lafayette recovered, Washington tried to attack the British Hessian forces in Germantown, a few miles north of Philadelphia. The battleground was foggy, and though very few men were killed, many were injured due to the poor visibility. Eventually, Washington’s troops were forced to (once again) retreat, though the British were finally impressed with the Americans’ bravery—all the odds were against them, but the ragtag army still persisted.
The Patriot’s persistence had already helped them get aid and backing from the French government, but now, it also helped them frighten their enemies. Even in the thick of actual fighting, then, the Revolution can be seen as a partially symbolic war—for example, the fog that hurt the troops on the ground paradoxically helped their cause because the situation also showcased their tenacity.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Washington lost the battle in Pennsylvania, but Horatio Gates, another Patriot general, was much luckier. In a rare turn of events, the Americans outnumbered the British at the Battle of Saratoga, and Gates emerged with a critical victory. Though Washington was happy that his forces had at last succeeded, he was jealous of Gates, especially because Gates wanted to take over Washington’s post as first-in-command.
George Washington is arguably the most iconic figure in American history, as he’s often viewed as the person most responsible for the nation’s very existence. But here, Vowell humanizes him, showing that he, too, was capable of failure and petty jealousy. Rather than showing the Founding Fathers as a unit, Vowell thus presents them more like a group of friends, as prone to squabbling and gossip as any friend group would be.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Get the entire Lafayette in the Somewhat United States LitChart as a printable PDF.
Lafayette in the Somewhat United States PDF
Washington hoped to invade Philadelphia as a way of getting his own glorious moment, but his colleagues wisely talked him out of it; the Americans could not afford another loss, especially when it came to impressing their European allies. And indeed, the French were pleased enough by the win at Saratoga: when word of Gates’s triumph reached the European continent, Beaumarchais was so excited to break the news that he literally broke his arm on the way to tell his friends.
Indeed, Washington almost let his desire for personal glory get in the way of sound military strategy (a rarity for the mostly level-headed general). Also worth noting here is the extent to which Frenchmen like Beaumarchais were emotionally invested in American success.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Saratoga is often thought to be the battle that prompted Louis XVI to officially recognize America as an independent government. Vowell acknowledges there is some truth to that narrative, but she also makes it clear that the French were just as impressed by Washington’s loss as they were by Gates’s win. After all, the Battle at Germantown showed just how committed the Americans were to victory at any cost, and that commitment impressed both King Louis and his Spanish allies.
Again, symbolic victory was almost as important as military victory in the early years of the Revolution. The narrative surrounding Patriot persistence was so compelling to King Louis XVI that he continued to fund what in many ways should have been a lost cause. 
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
After Lafayette recovered from his injury, he was ready to get back into the thick of things, so he wrote to Washington asking for increased responsibilities as a military leader. In contrast to many of the other French soldiers, Lafayette had impressed Washington with his eager-to-please attitude and his fast language learning. So, when Nathanael Greene (the Fighting Quaker) prepared to attack the British in New Jersey, Washington sent Lafayette along as his second in command.
To the extent that Vowell is writing about Lafayette’s transformation from a young boy into a man, this moment of trust on Washington’s part is a huge stepping stone on that journey. Though Lafayette was still hungry for glory and danger, he had also earned enough trust from the Patriot higher-ups to be given real military command.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
In New Jersey, Lafayette was able to find a weak patch in the British line of defense, and—always “determined to be in the way of danger”—he attacked. This successful maneuver earned Lafayette Washington’s respect and command of his own army unit in Virginia. The unit was in a sorry state (again, they had only hunting shirts as uniforms), but Lafayette vowed to provide them with training and even cloth at his own expense.
Not only was Lafayette becoming a more thoughtful, generous person (as can be seen in his decision to donate uniforms), but he was also becoming a better fighter. Whereas at Brandywine, his desire for danger merely got him shot in the leg, in New Jersey, Lafayette put his bravery to better use, and he was able to achieve real success.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
Crucially, even as Lafayette gained power, he never grew less enamored of General Washington. But in the fall of 1777, many men in Congress (John Adams included) were so frustrated about Washington’s Fabian strategy that they were thinking of demoting him. In fact, once Washington became president, many American dignitaries would scramble to hide or retract the scathing critiques they had made of him during this dark time.
The conflict over whether Washington would retain his position signals both Lafayette’s loyalty and the Patriots’ pettiness. Rather than prioritizing tactical continuity, each politician and soldier looked at Washington through the lens of his own personal grievances and desires. Lafayette was therefore the exception, not the rule. In part because he viewed Washington as a father figure, Lafayette never tried to unseat the soon-to-be-beloved general.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
The most involved attempt to replace Washington was known as the “Conway cabal.” Thomas Conway was a Frenchman who had wound up in America because of his relationship with Silas Deane. In a moment where Washington was particularly unpopular, Conway wrote to Congress asking to be made Commander in Chief. When Washington found out, he threatened to quit entirely. Ultimately, Congress refrained from replacing Washington, but they still promoted Conway, adding to Washington’s sense of unease. Throughout it all, Lafayette remained completely loyal: as he wrote in a letter to his beloved commander, “I am now fixed to your fate.”
Once again, Congress was trying to balance its reliance on Washington’s expertise with its desire to appease the French by promoting someone like Conway. It was thus especially important that Lafayette, as a high-status Frenchman, remained such a vocal and steadfast defender of Washington.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
There was a silver lining in Washington’s waning popularity, however—his lack of military success humanized him and made Americans more able to trust him. This was especially important because politicians like Adams were constantly worried that the new nation would succumb to a military dictatorship (as Rome had when Julius Caesar took over). Dictatorship would be a recurring fear in American politics, especially in the 1820s, when famed general Andrew Jackson shot to power. 
Democracy was especially fragile in the early days of the new United States, and a peaceful transfer of power was not guaranteed. The fact that Washington made his mistakes so publicly reassured his contemporaries that he would not be able to paint himself as a god of sorts—and therefore that he could not hold onto power forever.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
With Philadelphia now under British control, the Patriots’ squabbling reached new heights. As Congress hid out in Massachusetts, Lafayette complained of “parties who Hate one an other as much as the Common enemy.” But while many politicians pushed for the glory that would come regaining Philadelphia, it was impractical, especially since American soldiers lacked weaponry, shoes, and shirts.
Lafayette’s reflection about the dangers of opposing “parties” foreshadows the partisan conflict of 2013 (and today). And as in more contemporary times, such political debates often overshadow—or lose sight of—the fact that real people are struggling because of government’s failure to act.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Instead of rushing into battle, therefore, Washington decided to take the winter of 1777–1778 as a time for rebuilding American morale. The Patriots decamped to Valley Forge, about 20 miles north of Philadelphia, where they struggled not against the British but against frostbite and a whole host of diseases. At one point, a soldier was so thirsty that he spent the last money he had on a single sip of water.
The encampment at Valley Forge is one of the most discussed and memorialized events of the entire war. Rather than depicting the full extent of Patriot soldiers’ suffering, however, many people distort what happened at Valley Forge to tell a more cheerful story of American perseverance.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
In the centuries since this freezing winter, Valley Forge has become a symbol of American tenacity. But while later presidents like Dwight D. Eisenhower would valorize the campground, Vowell points out that much of the suffering here was America’s “self-inflicted wound,” the result of a massive administrative failure. As Lafayette himself understood, all this Patriot infighting was undermining the troops’ basic safety and health. 
Here, Vowell directly articulates what she has implied throughout the book: though political debate is healthy in moderation, too much of it can “wound” the very people politicians ostensibly serve. The starvation at Valley Forge was not purely an accident—it happened largely because generals and delegates failed to come together and act decisively.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
To expand on this failure, Vowell notes that there were crops available for the soldiers to eat, but no wagons to transport these crops. And while the British troops were well-fed and consistently well-supplied, Washington could not even fill crucial positions in the Valley Forge supply corps. Vowell then draws a direct parallel between this long-ago incompetence and the governmental failures that still plague the U.S. today: long lines at Veterans Affairs hospitals, underfunded public schools, and broken-down highways, for example. Vowell blames many of these failures on Americans’ longstanding reluctance to pay taxes.
In one of her most explicit and compelling historical parallels, Vowell argues that this kind of administrative failure is still present and deeply problematic in today’s United States. Because many Americans stubbornly hold onto certain principles—like resisting taxation in the same way their Revolutionary ancestors did centuries before—the most vulnerable members of society (children, veterans) are put at risk. 
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
At the same time, though, Vowell acknowledges that the soldiers at Valley Forge really did demonstrate “backbone, reliance, grit.” Public figures from Lafayette to Theodore Roosevelt have cited these men as an inspiration, though Vowell applauds the fact that during his presidency, Roosevelt’s idea of strength prioritized his citizens’ health and safety as well as their military might.
Though Roosevelt also simplified the history of Valley Forge, his own presidential behavior can be seen as a counterexample to the administrative failures Vowell critiques. Roosevelt valued symbolic victories and military might, but he knew that a functioning bureaucracy—capable of providing social services—was essential to such strength.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
When Vowell actually arrives at Valley Forge, she is once again struck by how peaceful and pleasant it looks. She reflects that Gettysburg, the site of the most famous battle of the Civil War, feels similarly unremarkable. The only way to know “about the fifty thousand men who were lost or ruined” at Gettysburg, Vowell writes, is “to read the National Parks Service’s signs.”
Once again, Vowell finds that a former site of violence now just looks like a lush field. Valley Forge and Gettysburg are two of the most brutal, bloody memories in American history, but there are no museums or monuments to help contemporary Americans make sense of these dark chapters. Thus, the peaceful fields of Valley Forge and Gettysburg signal how the U.S. rewrites its own past.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
Vowell visits Valley Forge with a British friend, but she is surprised to learn that her friend never learned about this crucial revolutionary site in school. Vowell’s friend explains that in his history classes, “we concentrated on the wars we won.” In other words, the American obsession with this war against the British is in many ways one-sided. 
The urge to gloss over painful history by talking about victory (and ignoring defeat) is not uniquely American. Here, Vowell learns that the British do it too, barely teaching their children about the American Revolution.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
A few months later in 1778, as Lafayette wrote home to his wife Adrienne, the anti-Washington gossip in Congress still had not quieted down. While Washington was trying to—at last—introduce military discipline to his troops, Conway and Gates were still gunning for the top job. Plus, to punish Lafayette for his loyalty to Washington, the Congressional Board of War sent him on a wild goose chase through upstate New York.
The extent of American governmental dysfunction is especially clear during this stretch of 1778. Rather than using the talented, dedicated volunteer soldier they had in Lafayette, the various anti-Washington politicians preferred to enact petty grudges on the battlefield.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Luckily, the Americans had a new asset in the Prussian soldier Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben. Steuben was renowned in Europe for his military prowess, and though the U.S. wanted to stop importing soldiers from overseas, Steuben was too valuable to pass up. So, with Beaumarchais’ help, Steuben made his way across the Atlantic and volunteered his service. The only complication was that Steuben was (probably) gay, and Washington was simply the first of many American generals to be intensely homophobic. Thus, for his entire time in America, Steuben had to keep his true identity secret.
Baron von Steuben is another pivotal figure in the Revolutionary War. As one of the only fighters with traditional military training, he would prove invaluable in forcing the American troops into shape. Furthermore, though it is not a major plot point in the text, it is still worth noting the historical parallel Vowell draws between the bias Steuben faced and later homophobic American laws like “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (which barred open gay or bisexual people from military service).
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
Once Steuben arrived at Valley Forge, he was impressed that the Americans had managed to hold themselves together even with so few resources. But things were looking up: Nathanael Greene was now in charge of the supplying the soldiers, a task he completed with grace, while Steuben was going to teach the Americans some long-overdue battle tactics.
Unlike the heat-of-the-moment battlefield glory that Lafayette had always dreamed of, real American success came in less glamorous improvements. The main shift in Patriot fortunes happened on an administrative level—the troops had more to eat and better weapons and tactics to practice with.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
But though Steuben was itching to introduce some discipline into the army at Valley Forge, Washington understood that this would be more difficult in the colonies than it had been in Europe. After all, the soldiers were motivated to fight because they believed in independence, and so it was hard to convince these new Patriots to follow orders of any kind. Steuben, too, soon realized that he could not give orders without explaining why he had given the order in the first place, a reality that made his job harder but that also added to his admiration of the Americans.
The American focus on independence and democracy had already created complications when it came time to agree on laws and policies. Here, Steuben realized that training a democratic army would be more difficult because a group of people accustomed to political representation would similarly expect their voices to be heard when it came to military maneuvers.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
Under Steuben’s guidance, the Patriot army finally learned how to perform drills and operate as a coherent unit (and it didn’t hurt that the soldiers finally got uniforms). Washington even promoted Steuben, angering Gates and Conway but pleasing Beaumarchais. Ultimately, Washington had proved himself, and Congress sided with him while his competitors quietly left the highest ranks of the American military.
Valley Forge was a turning point for several reasons, but one of the most important is that it marks the end of the conspiracy against Washington. From the 1778 onward, Washington would be almost universally trusted and respected.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Best of all, France had at long last formally recognized American independence. But just as Lafayette was joining in a flurry of public celebration, he learned that his baby daughter had died back in France. Though Lafayette expressed his grief in letters to Adrienne, he continued to lead military parades to honor the new Franco-American alliance.
In this passage, Lafayette both literally and symbolically chooses his love of the new United States over his loyalty to his family back home. As an important connection between the French and the U.S., Lafayette understood his own importance to the celebrations of the Franco-American alliance—but his sense of duty did not extend to the flesh-and-blood child he had just lost.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
To formalize the alliance, Louis XVI invited Benjamin Franklin—still dressed like a farmer—to the showy palace at Versailles. Vowell points out the irony in the fact that “this deeply weird partnership was history’s first military pact between an absolute monarch and anti-monarchist republicans.” It took a lot of diplomatic skill for Franklin to convince King Louis that supporting an independence movement was really in his best interest. And indeed, a decade later Louis XVI would indeed express regret about backing the Americans’ revolutionary effort.
When Vowell praises Franklin’s diplomatic skill, she is also calling attention to his particularly gifted use of symbolism. In portraying the Patriots as a folksy, pastoral people, Franklin was able to divert King Louis’s attention away from the political danger a democratic revolution posed to a monarch. In other words, since the Revolution itself, Americans have been skilled at using American mythology for political gain.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Inflamed by news that France was formally backing the new United States, the British declared war on the French. At the same time, fearing that they might be outmatched, the British tried to patch things up with the rebellious colonists, offering to repeal some of the steepest taxes. But it was too late. As Washington put it, this far into the war, “nothing short of Independence […] can possibly do.”
Once more, the age-old tensions between the British and the French reared their head, prompting Britain to try to make amends with the disgruntled Patriots. But whereas initially the Americans were fighting to avoid taxation, now they were fighting more for principles than for material gain.
Themes
Democracy, Disagreement, and Compromise Theme Icon
Rather than merely celebrate the Patriots’ persistence, however, Vowell points out that independence was far from universal. Slavery was abolished in Great Britain three decades before the U.S. followed suit—because the freedom that the Patriots fought for was really freedom for white men only. To emphasize this contradiction, Vowell quotes Frederick Douglass, the once-enslaved writer, orator and activist who famously declared on Independence Day that “this is your Fourth of July, not mine.”
Yet while the Americans claimed to fight for a noble, more free ideology, the practice of slavery undercut all this high-minded rhetoric. As Frederick Douglass made clear in his speech “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”, the “independence” Americans fought for was hypocritical, as white people’s freedom was founded on the enslavement of Black people.
Themes
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon
By May of 1778, the British Commander-in-Chief William Howe had been replaced by Henry Clinton. As Washington debated whether to attack Clinton in New Jersey, he leaned on Greene, Steuben, Knox and Lafayette as his most trusted military advisors.
The fact that the still-youthful Lafayette was now one of Washington’s closest advisors shows just how much the Frenchman had proved his worth during his time in America.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
The other person present in these discussions was General Charles Lee, who had been held as a British prisoner of war—and who was now trying to play both sides of the conflict. When Lee retreated in the heat of the Battle at Monmouth (possibly throwing the fight to the British), Washington flew into a rage and court-martialed him. Still, the town of Fort Lee in New Jersey continues to bear Charles Lee’s name, prompting Vowell to joke that Lee’s behavior was “the most New Jersey-like in the battle, if not the entire war.”
Lee’s flip-flopping loyalty between the British and the Americans shows that these two opposing camps were actually much more similar than different. In many ways, the Patriots were still culturally British; most rebellious soldiers had Loyalist family members, and it was not uncommon for individuals to feel torn between rival camps. On another note, Vowell’s New Jersey joke again reflects her use of humor as a means of linking the present to the past.
Themes
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
Trapped into a corner by Lee’s retreat, Washington had no choice but to stand and fight Clinton’s Redcoats. Once again, Washington’s “coolness and firmness” rallied the Patriot troops, inspiring great admiration in men like Lafayette and Alexander Hamilton. Vowell adds that the Patriots were also newly able to hold their ground, in large measure because of Steuben’s military guidance.
Washington is an icon even today, but his status as a real-life hero was critical to the Patriots’ success throughout the Revolution. The great general inspired this kind of admiration in all of his troops, from regular soldiers to high-ranking officers like Hamilton.
Themes
Youthful Glory vs. Mature Leadership Theme Icon
War, Politics, and Family Theme Icon
When Vowell visits Monmouth, she is struck by the monument to Mary Hays, a folk hero who may or may not have actually existed. The legend goes that when Hays found her husband dead, she was so committed to the Patriot cause that she immediately stepped in and took his place. Vowell has heard a rumor that this sculpture of Mary Hays is actually based on the inventor Thomas Edison, and she and her friend Sherm reflect on Edison’s grit.
Though there are no markers of the suffering and death that occurred at Monmouth, there is a statue of a folk hero. On the one hand, Monmouth is one more place in which Americans smooth over the messier aspects of their history. On the other hand, the possibly fictionalized Mary Hays is one of the few women who is honored in the Revolution’s all-male historical narrative.
Themes
Landscape and Historical Memory Theme Icon
Freedom and Protest Theme Icon