Changes in the Land

by

William Cronon

Changes in the Land: Chapter 6 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
The population of wild mammals in New England did not just decline because of the fur market, but also because of the destruction of edge habitats. Colonizers were aggressive in cutting down trees for several reasons, among them that timber was one of the first commodities that could be sent back to Europe to be sold. Beginning in the 1630s, commercial lumbering was mostly concentrated in Maine and New Hampshire, where trees far bigger than any species in Europe grew. For the first time, ship masts could be constructed from a single tree rather than joining two different pieces of wood together. A royal charter decreed that the very biggest masts could be used for the Royal Navy only. 
In ecology, “edge habitats” are boundary areas where animal habitats meet human ones. In the colonial period, colonizers (logically) cut down trees that were near their settlements, thereby steadily encroaching on the edge habitats of wild animals and contributing to these animals dying out. 
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Systems and Interdependence Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
The colonizers lumbered as if the forest was an infinite resource, often wasting entire trees in their rush to access the most valuable timber. This continued into the nineteenth century. Similar to how the colonizers saw beavers, types of trees came to be seen as commodities, each with a particular value. Over time, certain species began to disappear and parts of the forest became barren. Species that became much rarer include pine and cedar trees. Starting in the 1790s, certain colonizers argued that measures should be taken to protect part of the forest from being lumbered. Yet the main factor leading to the disappearance of trees was not even lumbering—it was actually farming.
This passage serves as an important reminder that colonizers did not have an unrelentingly destructive attitude toward the environment—to claim this would be a massive oversimplification. Some made arguments for preservation (although they would have had many different reasons for doing so and may not have been interested in preserving ecosystems for their own sake). Nonetheless, these deviations from the norm were not enough to protect the land.
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
Quotes
After settlements had already appeared on all the land that was already clear, settlers began clearing the forest in order to farm, a process that depleted the fertility of the soil in these areas. Clearing was achieved in two ways, the first of which was girdling, which was slowly killing trees by stripping off their bark, combined with burning undergrowth. This method didn’t require much labor and was better for maintaining soil nutrients for longer, but it wasted trees. The dead trees also caused damage when they fell, sometimes even killing people and livestock.
In the age of mass awareness about the dangers of deforestation, it might seem startling that colonizers were so aggressively intent on clearing New England’s forests, which had enormous ecological and economic value. However, it is difficult to overemphasize the importance of farming for these settlers, and this significantly influenced their behavior. 
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Systems and Interdependence Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
The second method became increasingly popular over time to the point that, by the late 1700s, it was the only one used. It involved cutting trees down with an ax in summer and leaving them where they’d fallen until the next spring, at which point they’d be burned. This created a single blast of nutrients in the soil that was ultimately less long-lasting. The ash from dead trees was sold as fertilizer, charcoal, and potash, a substance used in soap and gunpowder. Using this method, land could make a lot of money very quickly, which led to forests being destroyed in this manner at significant rates.
During this part of the book, it will become clear to the reader that one characteristic feature of the colonial economy was a preference for immediate profits over sustainability (indeed, this feature is still a part of the economic structure of the world today). This preference often. had long term negative consequences that might not have been clear at the time.
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Systems and Interdependence Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
Get the entire Changes in the Land LitChart as a printable PDF.
Changes in the Land PDF
Colonizers imitated the practice of forest burning from Native people, but instead of restricting this to undergrowth they burned the entire forest. This was wasteful, destructive, and dangerous. Laws were passed in order to restrict burning to a given property, with penalties if the fire reached neighboring properties. Rather than abiding by agricultural principles, the colonizers’ form of burning conformed to their strict definition of private property. Timber had at first seemed so infinitely plentiful in New England that colonizers used it in an excessive, wasteful manner, to the point that construction came to require untenable amounts of timber. Fences, for example, were made of timber, whereas back in Europe they would have been made of hedges or stone.
This passage helps illuminate what people mean when they argue that there is an inherent clash between capitalism and the environment. Non-capitalist cultures, such as those of indigenous people, often organize life around environmental resources and limitations. Capitalism has an entirely different organizing principle (profit) which arguably clashes with environmental realities. 
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Systems and Interdependence Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
Quotes
However, the most significant use of timber was as a fuel. This was in part because New England colonizers had open fireplaces, which were very wasteful in comparison to the enclosed stoves popular in Northern Europe. As a result, colonizers burned through a staggering amount of wood. Wood shortages were a common problem and as the forest was steadily destroyed, lumberers had to travel farther and farther for timber. Over time, fuel prices rose enormously. As deforestation proliferated, profound ecological consequences ensued, to the point of even causing climate change. There were more forest fires in spring and deeper layers of soil froze in the winter, which increased flooding. There was also a corresponding drying up of streams and springs.
In the age of climate change, it has become obvious to many people living in the West that an individual human practice (such as having an open fireplace) can have extraordinary consequences for the environment, many of which follow indirect patterns of causation. Yet this was generally not part of the colonizers’ worldview.
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Systems and Interdependence Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
In other places, however, previously dry land got turned into swamps, which led to disease caused by the mosquitoes that proliferated around poorly drained areas. As the land became drier, those working in sawmills found that there was not enough water to keep the mills functioning. Together, these consequences highlight how drastically the deforestation committed by colonizers transformed the New England landscape. Europeans, however, chose to interpret deforestation constructively—it was their way of transferring their “old and familiar way of life” into the New World.
Again, part of the reason why colonizers might not have immediately been aware of the negative consequences of their practices is that when they saw the land changing, they chose to interpret this as a positive thing. Claiming that they had been divinely commanded to “tame” and “civilize” the American landscape and make it more similar to Europe, they misperceived the results of what they were doing.
Themes
Natural vs. Unnatural Change Theme Icon
Systems and Interdependence Theme Icon
Property Ownership, Commodities, and Profit Theme Icon
Colonization and the Limits of Understanding Theme Icon
Human vs. Environmental History Theme Icon
Quotes