How to Be an Antiracist

by

Ibram X. Kendi

How to Be an Antiracist: Chapter 12: Class Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Kendi defines a class racist as someone who racializes certain socioeconomic groups or supports racial capitalist policies. Meanwhile, an antiracist anti-capitalist opposes racial capitalism.
So far, Kendi has presented the main categories of racial ideas and then focused on the way people of color promote racism through colorism, anti-white ideas, and the powerless defense. Now, he starts to look at how racism intersects with other structures of social hierarchy, starting with socioeconomic class.
Themes
Intersectionality Theme Icon
When Kendi started graduate school, he moved to a lively and diverse but dangerous “ghetto” neighborhood in Philadelphia. Black migrants from the South moved there during the 20th century, before the white population left for government-subsidized suburbs where Black people legally couldn’t live. Like all American ghettoes, it was created by government policy. But now, the word “ghetto” is associated with poor Black people and antisocial behavior.
Like urban neighborhoods all around the United States, Kendi’s neighborhood in Philadelphia was poor and predominantly Black because the government implemented specific segregation policies. Americans usually associate segregation with the South before the Civil Rights Movement—but American cities remain heavily segregated because of past formal housing discrimination and present informal discrimination.
Themes
Racism vs. Antiracism Theme Icon
The History of Racist Ideas and Policies Theme Icon
“Black poor” is what Kendi calls a race-class, defined by both racialization (Black) and economic class (poor). Class racism combines elitist ideas about poor people with racist ideas about certain groups, and these ideas then support elitist and racist policies. Antiracists respond to class racist concepts like “white trash” and “ghetto Blacks” by insisting that these groups are equal to all others. Their troubles stem from policy, not personal or cultural inferiority, as elite classes might suggest.
The concept of race-class describes how racism and capitalism work together to produce unique forms of inequity for people who are in both subordinate racial groups and subordinate class groups. It largely functions through the same process as racism: policies create inequities, and ideas emerge to justify them.
Themes
Racism vs. Antiracism Theme Icon
In the 1950s, anthropologist Oscar Lewis blamed marginalization on a “culture of poverty,” an idea that’s still popular today. Other scholars, like Kenneth Clark, saw that oppressive policies actually created intergenerational poverty. Some policymakers interpreted this argument as meaning that welfare was oppressive and needed to be withdrawn. Like many elite Black people, Clark indirectly supported this by viewing poor Black people’s culture as degraded and inferior due to oppression. Barack Obama frequently echoes this idea. Ultimately, like racist white people, these Black elites attack poor Black people in order to feel a sense of superiority.
Although Clark saw that government policies intentionally impoverished Black communities, his assumption that this made these communities inferior is a form of cultural and class racism. This shows that races are not homogeneous groups: rather, there are many different divisions and sub-groups within them. Inequities among these sub-groups underline the importance of addressing racism through an intersectional lens, by paying attention to the diverse experiences and needs of all the people whom racism disadvantages.
Themes
Racism vs. Antiracism Theme Icon
Intersectionality Theme Icon
The History of Racist Ideas and Policies Theme Icon
Get the entire How to Be an Antiracist LitChart as a printable PDF.
How to Be an Antiracist PDF
In Philadelphia, Kendi realized that the ghetto was formed through racial capitalism, the alliance between racism and capitalism. Martin Luther King Jr. pointed this out in 1967, but few people listened. Capitalism and racism were born together, through the transatlantic slave trade and European colonization. These policies were designed to turn a profit and were justified through racism. They ultimately led to war and genocide.
The concept of racial capitalism comes from the recognition that racism and capitalism are interdependent systems: they came into existence together. During the era of colonization in early modernity, racism maintained the hierarchical social order necessary for capitalism to function—and it arguably continues to do so today.
Themes
Intersectionality Theme Icon
Now, stark racial inequities in poverty, unemployment, wages, and wealth show that racial capitalism continues as before. And these inequities are worsening: globally, the income gap between rich (mostly white) nations and poor (mostly non-white) nations has tripled in the last 50 years. In the United States, white people have much greater social mobility and wealth, even when controlling for income. This is, in part, because poor white people tend to live in otherwise middle-class neighborhoods, while poor Black people tend to live in segregated neighborhoods where everyone is poor and Black.
Kendi believes that industrialized Europe and North America are wealthy because most of the rest of the world is poor. Global economic power is largely in the hands of rich white people who act out of self-interest. Additionally, the difference between the poor Black neighborhoods and poor white neighborhoods shows how class takes on a fundamentally different meaning for members of different racial groups.
Themes
Racism vs. Antiracism Theme Icon
Intersectionality Theme Icon
The History of Racist Ideas and Policies Theme Icon
Kendi concludes that antiracists cannot address racial inequities without also being anti-capitalists, and anti-capitalists cannot address class inequities without being antiracists. For instance, many socialist groups have historically focused on white workers but wrongly excluded people of color, whose concerns they reduced to “identity politics.” But Karl Marx clearly saw that capitalism and racism were like “conjoined twins,” and W.E.B. Du Bois began formulating the idea of racial capitalism while reading Marx. The generation of antiracist anti-capitalist activists who immediately followed Du Bois faced persecution in the 1950s but rose up in the 1960s. This mindset became prominent again in the 2010s, after the Great Recession.
Because politics is about power, and elites have most of it, antiracist campaigns that focus on “identity politics” rather than economic justice for the working class end up becoming strongly biased toward elites. The policies they create—like diversity programs in governments, universities, and corporations—attempt to solve racism without rocking the boat about economic inequality. Since racism and capitalism are “conjoined twins,” these programs will never produce meaningful change for the vast majority of people of color.
Themes
Activism and Social Transformation Theme Icon
Intersectionality Theme Icon
The History of Racist Ideas and Policies Theme Icon
In today’s political discourse, conservatives frequently reject certain policies as “anticapitalist.” These include anti-poverty programs, labor union protections, and higher taxes on the rich. This suggests that they define capitalism as the freedom to exploit others, without restraint, for profit. In contrast, many liberals define capitalism as a belief in the power of well-regulated markets. Kendi agrees with these liberals’ goals, but their definition of capitalism is historically inaccurate. Markets existed long before capitalism and have never been fair under it. Capitalism only began when Europeans started using power constructs like race to divide and conquer people around the globe. Western countries  only built wealth because of slavery, colonialism, and the mass extraction of natural resources from colonized countries.
When liberals define capitalism as equitable and well-regulated markets, they’re suggesting that such markets have existed in the past—but they haven’t. Kendi argues that, in reality, capitalism has always been about the extraction of resources and the concentration of wealth and power. It is a free market for a small minority but an oppressive one for the majority of humanity. Truly free markets are antithetical to capitalism, which systematically produces inequality, not equality.
Themes
Racism vs. Antiracism Theme Icon
The History of Racist Ideas and Policies Theme Icon
Quotes
While Kendi’s mom and dad were nervous about him moving to the poor Black neighborhood, Kendi considered urban poverty the most authentic form of Blackness. So his consciousness was dueling between “Black is Beautiful” and “Black is Misery.” He was really acting in a racist way: he wanted the neighborhood to make him more Black. Genuine antiracism, however, requires seeing poor and elite Black culture as equals. Like many Black scholars, Kendi wrongly viewed elite Black culture as corrupt, inauthentic, and socially irresponsible. But it wasn’t—for instance, the Black elite led the civil rights movement.
Just like his anti-white racism and his insistence on only dating dark-skinned women in college, Kendi’s belief that poor Black culture is more authentic is really a way of flipping social hierarchies—not rejecting them altogether. Of course, it’s important to find value in the groups that conventional racist hierarchies denigrate—by saying, for example, that “Black is Beautiful.” But Kendi suggests that this should be a first step toward dissolving the hierarchy entirely and instead learning to view all groups as equal.
Themes
Racism vs. Antiracism Theme Icon
Activism and Social Transformation Theme Icon
Intersectionality Theme Icon
The History of Racist Ideas and Policies Theme Icon