Henry has more than his share of “loneliness” in Dijon, yet despite his earlier assertion that loneliness is vital to art, it doesn’t seem to help his artistic output at all. He writes as much here as he did in Paris (which is to say, nothing). The solitude does seem to afford him some psychological breakthroughs, however. His interpretation of all his past sexual relationships once again resembles Van Norden’s, but with an important difference: whereas Henry vainly sought to overcome his existential aloneness in sex by uniting with another, Van Norden wanted simply to obliterate himself.