Nur’s offended response to Deven suggests that, even after all the effort Deven has put into interviewing him, he might simply refuse to give Deven any usable material. It’s not clear if he enjoys stringing Deven along, or if he still views Deven as a secretary who works for
him, and so is only willing to share his poetry on
his terms. Regardless, his complaint is similar to Imtiaz’s claim that scholars only study poets in order to “feed upon [their] carcasses”—or profit from their hard work. In short, Nur and Imtiaz both challenge the notion that interpreting a work of literature is a service to the author and the reading public. Rather, they present it as a selfish way for the critic to use (or even distort) a work for their own ends.