In Chapter 5, Franklin employs personification and paradox to illustrate Sybylla's internal conflict. As Sybylla yearns for a life beyond her small farming community, she grapples with the nature of hope:
Hope—sweet, cruel, delusive Hope—whispered in my ear that life was long with much by and by, and in that by and by my dream life would be real.
The personification of Hope as a "sweet, cruel" and "delusive" being adds depth to Sybylla's struggle against her poverty and the decline in her family’s circumstances. Hope is "sweet" in its allure, providing Sybylla with dreams of an alternative future filled with opportunities and excitement. At the same time, it's "cruel" because that picture is the opposite of her current reality.
"Hope" emphasizes the gap between her aspirations and her circumstances. This personification helps the reader feel the psychological tension that Sybylla faces. It's clear in this passage that for Sybylla, hope is a double-edged sword—it brings her both pleasure and pain. The term "delusive"also suggests the uncertainty inherent in Sybylla's hopes They may or may not come to fruition, and this precariousness adds some psychological tension to the narrative.
Franklin also uses the duality of “Hope” to reflect the paradox in the feelings Sybylla has towards her future. On the one hand, she craves more than what her life currently offers; this is the "sweetness" of hope. On the other hand, the very act of hoping serves as a bitter reminder of her restrictive surroundings: this is its cruelty. The idea that hope can be “sweet” and “cruel” at the same time is paradoxical, and it reflects Sybylla's youthful struggle to understand herself. Hoping makes things better and worse. Franklin uses all these contradictions to give the reader a sense of Sybylla’s complex, nuanced feelings surrounding her difficulties.