Our Missing Hearts

by

Celeste Ng

Our Missing Hearts: Part 2, Chapter 3 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
The next morning, Margaret continues her story. She tells Bird about a young Black protester named Marie Johnson who was shot and killed by police just after Bird’s ninth birthday. In the news photo taken just after Marie was shot, she holds a homemade sign that reads “ALL OUR MISSING HEARTS.” News of more PACT child removals brought the lines of Margaret’s final poem to Marie’s mind. At the time, Marie had been studying to be a pediatrician. Despite the general public support for PACT, Marie’s murder triggers outrage and leads more people to Margaret’s poetry collection. The anti-PACT movement adopts “all our missing hearts” as a slogan, despite Margaret’s own indifference to the law.
Marie’s murder acts as a catalyst, sparking outrage but also drawing attention to Margaret’s poetry collection through sheer coincidence. The fact that Margaret’s poem is not a commentary on PACT is irrelevant to protesters and PACT officials alike, demonstrating how art can take on a life of its own. The situation also shows how censorship is more concerned with political control than truth; because of this, Margaret comes under fire despite her poem’s innocuous intent and her own thoughts on PACT.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
In the flashback, Margaret’s words continue to spread among those who oppose PACT. A radio host broadcasts about Margaret, calling her a radical person of Asian origin. More media outlets dive into Margaret’s life, interpreting her poetry as encouraging harmful, un-American ideology in young people. They insist that she is clearly loyal to China, her foreign mindset rooted “in the DNA.” Margaret’s publisher is ordered to stop printing her book, and libraries pull it from their shelves. She receives threatening phone calls after her personal information is posted online. Now, even her personal home is unsafe.
Margaret’s race amplifies the scrutiny and condemnation of PACT supporters, despite her genuine lack of involvement with the protesters using her words. The radio host uses her PAO status as an excuse to generalize about other Asian Americans, magnifying a racist mindset. The censorship of Margaret’s book emphasizes the irrationality of attacks on free speech, while simultaneously indicating the power of art in shaping public opinion. The harassment Margaret faces exhibits how censorship can often escalate into an attack on the author’s personal character and livelihood.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Quotes
Eventually, the public finds out about Bird. Online commenters call Margaret a child abuser and hope that Family Services will come remove him. Ethan’s parents begin to believe the rumors about Margaret, and Ethan cuts contact with them. One day, they find a note from Bird’s teacher warning them that Family Services is looking into them. That night, Margaret prepares to leave her family, seeing no other way to ensure Bird’s safety. She leaves the next morning. When Family Services arrives, Ethan has already burned her books, and he denounces her in front of Bird.
The irony of Margaret’s reasons for abandoning Bird come to the forefront here: she leaves in order to protect him from being removed from both parents. The result is more or less the same: Margaret and Bird are separated. This moment draws attention to the difficult decisions parents make to protect their children, and the faultiness of a system which harms children while claiming to protect them. Ethan’s commitment to the illusion that Margaret means nothing to him is a necessary front to protect Bird, revealing his understanding of his own parental responsibility. 
Themes
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Not knowing yet where to go, Margaret takes a bus to Philadelphia to apologize to Marie’s parents. On their doorstep, she tells Mr. Johnson and Mrs. Johnson who she is, that she is being hunted, that she never meant for her poems to get anyone killed. Deep in grief, Marie’s father has no forgiveness to offer, only bitter disdain. Margaret thinks of how her Asian parents and she have, on occasion, espoused anti-Black bias. The history of her and the Johnsons’ worlds weighs on her. Marie’s mother asks if Margaret has children, and she tells her about Bird, whom she will never see again. Mrs. Johnson welcomes her to “the worst club in the world.” 
Margaret’s interaction with the Johnsons draws attention to the ways authoritarian governments turn citizens against one another, while never answering for their own crimes. Though Margaret and her words are not responsible for Marie’s death, she feels accountable, nevertheless. The racial tensions between the two parties briefly show how discrimination isolates minorities and pits them against one another. Mrs. Johnson is able to find common ground with Margaret as a mother and actively resists this isolation.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon
Quotes
Get the entire Our Missing Hearts LitChart as a printable PDF.
Our Missing Hearts PDF
Mrs. Johnson invites Margaret in, though Mr. Johnson disapproves. She shows Margaret Marie’s high school photos and a china elephant Marie intentionally broke to see what was inside. Mrs. Johnson laments that no one but her will remember these things. Margaret asks Mrs. Johnson to tell her more about Marie, and for two days Mrs. Johnson does. She tells Margaret to remember the stories and to remember that Marie was a real person. Mrs. Johnson shares insignificant memories of Marie’s childhood and of the plans her daughter had for her future.
Positioning Marie as an anti-PACT martyr dismisses the specificity of her personhood; in this way, the novel confronts how media sensation (like authoritarian governments) often disregards the truth to promote its own agenda. Mrs. Johnson’s focus on the details that made her daughter unique reveals another layer of the parental experience: the intimate and irreplaceable knowledge of one’s child. Regardless of any good that comes from Marie’s death, her parents will always have lost a daughter, and that is tragic.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
On the second night of Margaret’s visit, Mr. Johnson tells her about his last phone call with Marie. He told her not to go to the protest: that nobody of Asian origin would stick their neck out for her. Marie responded that it was wrong to take children from their families, a heavy sentiment that resonated with Marie’s own family, whose research had shown proof of child removal from the years of Black enslavement. Margaret tells Mr. Johnson that neither he nor Marie was wrong. Mr. Johnson tells another story of Marie laughing uncontrollably, a joyful memory. When Margaret leaves, he asks her to put his daughter in a poem. Margaret knows no poem can truly encapsulate a person, but says she will try.
Mr. Johnson’s comments point again to the isolating effects of racial discrimination, which can cause minorities to look out for members of their own group and no one else, regardless of similar experiences. Marie’s ability to draw parallels between her personal history and PACT child removals is empathic but—in her father’s view—naïve and idealistic. To Margaret, both Marie and Mr. Johnson’s positions have merit. Mr. Johnson’s memory of Marie’s joy again emphasizes her individual importance, especially to her parents. Margaret’s idea that no poem can capture a person’s essence reflects on the limitations of art.
Themes
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Marie’s parents give Margaret the name of their local librarian, Mrs. Adelman, who was Marie’s friend. Mrs. Adelman recognizes Margaret at once: she is the one who gave Marie a copy of Our Missing Hearts, which has since been removed from the library’s shelves. Mrs. Adelman asks about Bird, and she realizes what Margaret’s presence means: “before they removed him, you removed yourself.” She tells Margaret about the many families that PACT splits up. She has heard of people trying to track down the removed children. She offers to connect Margaret with one such family.
In entering the library—a hub of free speech and resistance to censorship—Margaret steps further outside her preferred bubble of ignorance. Mrs. Adelman seems aware that Margaret has been unwillingly dragged into the resistance and judges her for it, highlighting the harm of her silence and complicity. Nevertheless, Mrs. Adelman understands the parental sacrifice Margaret has made and senses her desire to make up for it. In this way, the novel underscores how privileged indifference to injustice can perhaps be remedied by getting involved.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon
Margaret follows Mrs. Adelman’s connections to family after family whose children have been removed for their violations of PACT. It becomes clear that such violations are widely varied: anything from criticizing PACT in public or on social media, writing about re-placed children or anti-Asian bias can lead to parents being reported. Bribery, donations, and connections might keep one’s child safe from removal, but removal is much more common than Margaret believed. Many families stay silent, hoping good behavior will bring their children back to them. In this way, people stopped speaking about PACT out of fear. Margaret moves as a fugitive from this point forward, avoiding detection just like her mother and father taught her, and wondering how so many stories go untold.
Speaking to families with removed children reveals how corrupt and arbitrary the enforcement of PACT really is. The removal of children—touted as a way to protect them from dangerous ideologies—is really a means of political control. Such shady practices illustrate how effective fear is in making people conform to the dominant culture. Margaret’s surprise at these stories once again characterizes her as privileged and ignorant; in this way, she—like Bird in the present—steps out of her fantasy world into reality.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon
Quotes
Out of money, Margaret returns to New York City and looks up Domi’s family townhouse on Park Avenue. She knows from news articles that Domi returned to her wealthy father, Claude Duchess, and inherited his electronics company, selling out in the same way she once accused Margaret of doing. Margaret also knows that Domi makes philanthropic use of her wealth, donating to shelters, food banks, and libraries. Before she left home, Margaret hid Domi’s address in Bird’s cubby, the safest place she could think of. After the old friends reunite, Domi tells Margaret she waited out the Crisis with her father and stepmother in their summer cabin, hiding away from it all. She inherited her father’s company (and his debts) when he died.
Domi’s return to her wealthy family recalls Margaret’s retreat into comfort with Ethan during the Crisis’ latter years. However, Domi’s philanthropic contributions illustrate her understanding that her privilege means she has a responsibility to use her influence and power to help others. As Margaret is now coming to this same realization, she seeks out Domi in the hope that she can similarly use her influence to promote justice.
Themes
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon
Though Margaret does not yet have a plan, she feels the need to help the families PACT split apart, and she asks for Domi’s help. Tracing the flow of information, she discovers a network of libraries passing messages via the books shared between them. Encoded in the messages are the names and descriptions of missing children, whom the librarians keep an eye out for, passing on known locations based on things they have overheard. Though matches are rare and families still cannot be reunited, it is the best the librarians can do. Through this network, Margaret contacts more families whose children have been taken.
Libraries are not only a natural symbol for free access to information, but—in this world—they actively participate in anti-censorship resistance. The way that libraries share information about missing children again characterizes these public institutions as defensive bastions against attacks on free speech. The librarians who take personal risks to help in this way provide a stark contrast to Margaret’s thoughtless complicity.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon
Margaret moves from place to place, seeking out and talking to families whose children were removed. It often takes a while for her to earn their trust. The families are not all Asian American: anyone who speaks up against PACT is endangered. They are angry and afraid, and some, like a Choctaw woman who lost her granddaughter, tell Margaret that the government taking children is nothing new. She asks those who will speak with her to tell their children’s stories and to tell her what they would say to their children if they could. She writes the stories down in the notebooks she carries with her.
In collecting the stories of families with missing children, Margaret provides a safe venue for previously voiceless people to speak up. Acknowledging that this is not the first time children have been taken to exert political control reinforces the idea that injustice is cyclical and repetitive. Recording the families’ stories emphasizes their importance, as Margaret is essentially preserving a history the authorities are actively trying to erase.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
At the start of her journey, Margaret stays in libraries after closing, reading books to distract her from painful thoughts of Ethan and Bird. She discovers the Russian poet Anna Akhmatova, who wrote glowing verse about Stalin, hoping that he would free her imprisoned son as a result. Margaret repeats Anna’s story to herself, adding embellishments: she imagines Anna as a poet who burns her work after committing it to memory, spreading it by whispering words into friends’ ears. Eventually, some families invite her to stay nights with them. She wakes in one such home to find a father tucking her in as if she were his own child.
Margaret identifies with Anna Akhmatova’s complicated experience of motherhood and her life under oppressive censorship. In repeating and embellishing Anna’s story, Margaret mythologizes this historical figure, demonstrating how imagination can sustain a person through difficult times. In particular, imagining Anna’s preservation of her art by sharing her poems with others mirrors Margaret’s own project of collecting the stories of separated families. Those families’ acceptance of Margaret is a testament to the sincerity of her atonement and the power of human empathy.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon
Margaret measures time in Bird’s age, thinking of what she is missing out on. She takes comfort in the strange artistic protests that are popping up all over the country—ice statues of missing children, a gigantic cube with a crack in it labeled “PACT.” No one claims credit for these stunts, but they hold the public’s attention better than a protest or a march. Often, they feature Margaret’s words: “our missing hearts,” and she thinks of them like independent children, off leading their own lives without her. One day, she sends a postcard with a drawing of a cat beside a little door to her old address. She sends more, increasing the number of cats, hoping Ethan and Bird will follow the clues to her.
Both Bird and the phrase “our missing hearts” are Margaret’s creations that now exist outside her direct influence, mirroring the parental experience of watching one’s children grow up. Like her poetry, art becomes the main vehicle for anti-PACT resistance, due to its ability to provoke critical thought without stoking violence. Margaret’s use of cats in her letters to Bird illustrates how art and symbols can be used to communicate complex ideas and feelings—like the longing for one’s child—through simple imagery.
Themes
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Quotes
Margaret sets a date—three years since she left her family—on which to “do it.” Domi sets her up in the brownstone and she begins collecting bottle caps. Not long after, a librarian tells her she has found a re-placed child who ran away from her foster family in Cambridge. Margaret meets Sadie, who recognizes her and tells her she knows Bird. Sadie explains that after running away from her new family, she traveled to her old house in Baltimore, but her parents were gone. She then ran to New York and sought help at the library, having learned from Carina, the Cambridge librarian, that the library is tracking missing children. Margaret convinces Domi to take Sadie in until they can focus on finding her parents. Sadie gives Margaret the address for Ethan and Bird’s dorm, which is how she sent Bird’s letter.
The novel creates suspense by withholding the specifics of Margaret’s plan with the bottlecaps. Discovering Sadie brings the possibility of reuniting with Bird back into focus for Margaret, who longs to see her son despite the dangers of contacting him. Sadie’s own attempt to reunite with her family despite similar dangers emphasizes the importance of parent-child relationships, and it reminds readers that PACT isn’t actually helping children. The very children who are supposedly being “helped” are going out of their way to find their beloved parents.
Themes
Surveillance, Fear, and Discrimination  Theme Icon
The Power of Art and Imagination   Theme Icon
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
In the present, Bird asks about Sadie. Margaret says he can see her soon, but she needed this time with him first. They hear someone enter the brownstone, but it is only Domi. She seems surprised that Margaret still intends to go through with her plan, now that Bird is here. (The plan’s details are still withheld.) Margaret insists. Tomorrow, Sadie and Bird will be taken somewhere safe while Margaret sets the plan in motion. Hesitantly, Bird agrees.
Domi’s surprise not only suggests that Margaret’s plan is risky in some way, but it also indicates an assumption that Margaret would change her mind now that Bird has returned to her. In this context, Margaret is choosing her resistance plan over Bird, risking herself for the sake of the movement rather than protecting herself for the sake of her child.
Themes
Parental Responsibility, Rights, and Experience  Theme Icon
Privilege, Silence, and Complicity  Theme Icon