Our Missing Hearts frames free speech and patriotism as opposing forces. The story takes place in an imagined version of America where lawmakers have created a new law, PACT (Preserving American Culture and Traditions) to root out “anti-American elements undermining the nation.” By encouraging citizens to report anyone spreading subversive information, funding watch groups to break up protests, and taking custody of children whose parents adopt unpatriotic viewpoints, PACT inhibits free speech and acts as the novel’s main antagonist. PACT directly affects Bird’s everyday life: his classrooms are devoid of books, he is questioned by police for defacing pro-PACT posters, and his friend Sadie is removed from her parents because of their journalistic investigations. Most significantly, Bird’s mother, Margaret, is forced to leave her family before her reputation as an anti-American poet brings harm to Bird. In all of these examples, the outlawing of ideas viewed as “anti-American” or “unpatriotic” demonstrates how prioritizing patriotism can lead to a loss of freedom.
Notably, libraries play a central role in the novel, representing the American public’s free access to information, which suffers greatly under the PACT law. Their collections are subject to government scrutiny, and the authorities remove books that they claim encourage unpatriotic sentiments. Because of this, much information is lost entirely, including Bird’s mother’s book of poetry. Carina, the Cambridge librarian who helps Bird, expresses her frustration over Bird’s ignorance of important historical events, sarcastically noting that telling Bird the truth about these historical events “would be espousing un-American views, and we certainly wouldn’t want that.” Here, she highlights how laws like PACT essentially corrupt the truth, preventing access to unflattering information about America’s past in the name of protecting nationalistic patriotism. In this way, the librarian’s remarks position patriotism—at least as PACT understands it—as a threat to free speech. In a broader sense, then, the novel suggests that freedom of thought goes hand in hand with free speech, and a government enforcing the preservation of subjectively-labeled “patriotic” ideals will inevitably corrupt the truth.
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth ThemeTracker
Free Speech, Patriotism, and the Corruption of Truth Quotes in Our Missing Hearts
Being a PAO, the authorities reminded everyone, was not itself a crime. PACT is not about race, the president was always saying, it is about patriotism and mindset.
You’d have to be a lunatic, Bird had agreed, to overturn PACT. PACT had helped end the Crisis; PACT kept things peaceful and safe. Even kindergarteners knew that. PACT was common sense, really. If you acted unpatriotic, there would be consequences. If you didn’t, then what were you worried about? And if you saw or heard of something unpatriotic, it was your duty to let the authorities know. He has never known a world without PACT; it is as axiomatic as gravity, or Thou shalt not kill. He didn’t understand why anyone would oppose it, what any of this had to do with hearts, how a heart could be missing. How could you survive without your heart beating inside you?
You need to show your teacher you really get this—there should be absolutely no question you understand. PACT protects innocent children from being indoctrinated with false, subversive, un-American ideas by unfit and unpatriotic parents.
In this country we believe that every generation can make better choices than the one that came before. Right? Everyone gets the same chance to prove themselves, to show us who they are. We don’t hold the mistakes of parents against their children.
Someone complained, probably. That it encouraged pro-PAO sentiment, or something. Some of our donors have—opinions. On China, or in this case, anything that vaguely resembles it. And we need their generosity to keep this place open. Or just as likely, someone got nervous and got rid of it preemptively. Us public libraries—a lot of us just can’t take the risk. Too easy for some concerned citizen to say you’re promoting unpatriotic behavior. Being overly sympathetic to potential enemies.
It’s dangerous to look like him, always has been. It’s dangerous to be his mother’s child, in more ways than one. His father has always known it, has always been braced for something like this, always on a hair trigger for what inevitably would happen to his son. What he’s afraid of: that one day someone will see Bird’s face and see an enemy. That someone will see him as his mother’s son, in blood or in deed, and take him away.
They don’t teach you any of this. Too unpatriotic, right, to tell you the horrible things our country’s done before. […] Because telling you what really happened would be espousing un-American views, and we certainly wouldn’t want that.
I told you, she says, that’s my job. Information. Passing it on. Helping people find what they need.
She sets the opened binder atop the shelf and slides it across to him.
What you do with this information, she says, is your own business only.
He notices how many, many American flags there are—on nearly every storefront, on the lapels of nearly every person he sees. […] Only when he’s left Chinatown, and the faces around him become Black and white instead of Asian, do the flags become more sporadic, the people here apparently more confident that their loyalty will be assumed.
PACT: Preserving American Culture and Traditions. A solemn promise to root out any anti-American elements undermining the nation. Funding for neighborhood-protection groups to break up protests and guard businesses and stores […] Funding for new initiatives to monitor China—and new watchdog groups to sniff out those whose loyalties might be divided. Rewards for citizen vigilance, information leading to potential troublemakers. And finally, most crucially: preventing the spread of un-American views by quietly removing children from un-American environments—the definition of which was ever expanding[.]
The anti-American ideology was clear, which made it all the more dangerous that people were reading these poems—nearly fifty thousand copies sold so far, an unheard-of number for a book of poetry, especially from a miniscule press. […] Regardless, these poems weren’t just un-American, they were inciting rebellion. Endorsing and espousing terrorist activity. Persuading others to support insurrection. Look how many anti-PACT protests were happening.
Sometimes it did turn out to be nothing. If you were well connected, if you showed the proper deference, or if perhaps you had a friend in the mayor’s office or the statehouse or, even better, the federal government, if in their background investigation it turned out you’d donated money to the right groups, or perhaps if you were willing to donate money right now—well then, perhaps you could make clear that you would never instill dangerous ideologies in your child.