Throughout Willa Cather’s 1927 novel Death Comes for the Archbishop, the Catholic priests and missionaries at the center of the narrative struggle to focus on large-scale spiritual concerns instead of more immediate material ones. At first, protagonists Bishop Jean-Marie Latour and Vicar Joseph Vaillant emphasize religious beliefs and practices above all. In moments of extreme hunger and thirst, for example, Latour works to ignore his bodily needs in favor of imagining Jesus Christ’s own suffering; Vaillant, ridding himself of his material possessions, devotes all his time to the contemplation of saints (May is the “month of Mary”) and far-flung conversion trips. The novel valorizes these men’s spiritual focus, especially in contrast to the narrative’s other, less-noble priests: Marino Lucero, who hoards money; Antonio Jose Martínez, who steals from persecuted indigenous men and refuses to remain celibate; and Baltazar Montoya, whose passion for fine food causes him to murder an indigenous servant. While Latour and Vaillant die at peace, widely beloved and respected, these materialistic priests suffer for their actions, winding up killed, disgraced, or (allegedly) punished in the afterlife.
But even as Latour and his Vicar try to abstain from tangible concerns, each finds himself caught up in the experiences of quotidian, embodied life. Latour becomes obsessed with building a new church in the old French style, and he devotes his final years to the “worldly” details of this project: where the church should be located, who should design it, and what kind of stone to use. And while Vaillant is considered one of the most ardently faithful men in the New World, he, too, cannot resist a card game or a good bottle of olive oil. As Latour and Vaillant get older, they become more comfortable with the way material aims connect to spiritual ones—Latour sees that Vaillant’s delight in fine food and lively friendship aids his religious efforts (“time and again the Bishop had seen a good dinner, a bottle of claret, transformed into spiritual energy under his very eyes”), while Vaillant comes to understand Latour’s love of tangible beauty as key to the Catholic church’s staying power. Ultimately, then, Death Comes for the Archbishop suggests that “worldly” cares can be just as important as spiritual ones—the key is simply to put the spiritual and physical worlds in conversation with each other.
Spirituality vs. the Material World ThemeTracker
Spirituality vs. the Material World Quotes in Death Comes for the Archbishop
“Think of it, Blanchet; in all this vast country between the Mississippi and the Pacific Ocean, there is probably not another human being who could make the soup like this.”
“Not unless he is a Frenchman,” said Father Joseph. He had tucked a napkin over the front of his cassock and was losing no time in reflection.
“I am not deprecating your individual talent, Joseph,” the Bishop continued, “but, when one thinks of it, a soup like this is not the work of one man. It is the result of a constantly refined tradition. There are nearly a thousand years of history in this soup.”
Soon after breakfast Father Vaillant departed, riding Contento, with Angelica trotting submissively behind, and from his gates Señor Lujon watched them disconsolately until they disappeared. He felt he had been worried out of his mules, and yet he bore no resentment. He did not doubt Father Joseph’s devotedness, nor his singleness of purpose. After all, a Bishop was a Bishop, and a vicar was a vicar, and it was not to their discredit that they worked like a pair of common parish priests. He believed he would be proud of the fact that they rode Contento and Angelica. Father Vaillant had forced his hand, but he was rather glad of it.
“At Ácoma,” [Father Jesus] said, “you can see something very holy. They have their portrait of St. Joseph, sent to them by one of the Kings of Spain, long ago, and it has worked many miracles. If the season is dry, the Ácoma people take the picture down to their farms at Ácoma, and it never fails to produce rain. They have rain when none falls in all the country, and may have crops when the Laguna Indians have none.”
The rock, when one came to think of it, was the utmost expression of human need; even mere feeling yearned for it; it was the highest comparison of loyalty and love and friendship. Christ Himself had used that comparison for the disciple to whom he gave the keys of His Church. And the Hebrews of the Old Testament, always being carried captive into foreign lands,—their rock was an idea of God, the only thing their conquerors could not take from them.
Already the Bishop had observed in Indian life a strange literalness, often shocking and disconcerting. The Ácomas, who must share the universal human yearning for something permanent, enduring, without shadow of change—they had their idea in substance. They actually lived upon their rock; were born upon it and died upon it.
The swarthy Padre laughed, and threw off the big cat which had mounted to his shoulder. “It will keep you busy, Bishop. Nature has got the start of you here. But for all that, our native priests are more devout than your French Jesuits. We have a living church here, not a dead arm of the European church. Our religion grew out of the soil, and has its own roots. We pay a filial respect to the person of the Holy Father, but Rome has no authority here. We do not require aid from the Propaganda, and we resent its interference. The Church the Franciscan Fathers planted here was cut off; this is the second growth, and it is indigenous. Our people are the most devout left in the world.”
Bishop Latour had one very keen worldly ambition: to build in Santa Fé a cathedral which would be worthy of a setting naturally beautiful. As he cherished this wish and meditated upon it, he came to feel that such a building might be a continuation of himself and his purpose, a physical body full of his aspirations after he had passed from the scene.
Never, as [Latour] afterward told Father Vaillant, had it been permitted him to behold such deep experience of the holy joy of religion as on that pale December night. He was able to feel, kneeling beside [Sada], the preciousness of the things of the altar to her who was without possessions; the tapers, the image of the Virgin, the figures of the Saints, the cross that took away indignity from suffering and made pain and poverty a means of fellowship with Christ. Kneeling beside the much enduring bondwoman, he experienced those holy mysteries as he had done in his young manhood. He seemed able to feel all it meant to her to know that there was a Kind Woman in Heaven, though there were such cruel ones on earth.
Though the Bishop had worked with Father Joseph for twenty-five years now, he could not reconcile the contradictions of his nature. He simply accepted them, and, when Joseph had been away for a long while, realized that he loved them all. His Vicar was one of the most truly spiritual men he had ever known, though he was so passionately attached to many of the things of this world. Fond as he was of good eating and drinking, he not only rigidly observed all the facts of the church, but he never complained about the hardness and scantiness of the fare on his long missionary journeys. Father Joseph’s relish for good wine might have been a fault in another man. But […] time and again the Bishop had seen a good dinner, a bottle of claret, transformed into spiritual energy under his very eyes.
There is always something charming in the idea of greatness returning to simplicity—the queen making hay among the country girls—but how much more endearing was the belief that They, after so many centuries of history and glory, should return to play Their first parts, in the persons of a humble Mexican family, the lowliest of the lowly, the poorest of the poor,—in a wilderness at the end of the world, where the angels could scarcely find Them!